First of all, I want to talk about those who falsify graduation data. Because of self-interest, cheating is an understandable behavior. Then, according to this logic. The fraud of selling milk powder is to support the family without considering the next generation, the fraud of testing department is for social harmony, and journalists create fake news to improve the visibility of their own departments or newspapers. It's not easy for everyone, so why bother each other?

As a graduate student, you should know that doing experiments is your job, and not cheating is the moral bottom line. I am lucky, my tutor has been guiding me, and the experiment is generally smooth. I also sympathize with those students who have no tutor or meet the best tutor and are forced by the teacher to do some useless data without results. I don't know how to solve this contradiction, but in any case, counterfeiting should not be done.

Next, regarding the problem of reporting, fraud is more difficult to prove than plagiarism. If it is plagiarism, you can report it to the editor in the magazine you see. The only thing that can prove that the experiment is fraudulent is to repeat the experiment and get the expected conclusion. You have no evidence, and you are confident that the other party plagiarized according to your subjective feeling.

Finally, about fraud. I repeated the experiment with a little girl in the lab according to an scI article, but I couldn't do it at all. I can't help it. I changed the experimental process and made it. From then on, she no longer believed in Korean Smecta's paper and was busy for two months. She found that there were still inconsistencies in the article. The whole person is not good.

It seems that counterfeiting is not unique to China.