> detecting information > analysis of "removing the copy rate of cited documents" and "removing the copy rate of published documents" in the paper search of China hownet.
Analysis of "Removing the Copy Rate of Cited Literature" and "Removing the Copy Rate of Published Literature" in China HowNet Paper Search.
The detection information ADMIN was viewed (20 16-08-23) 6 1089 times years ago.
It's the first time to use the academic misconduct duplicate checking system of China HowNet, and I pay more attention to the percentage of "removing the copy ratio of cited documents", but I don't know much about the percentage of "removing the copy ratio of my published documents", and I'm even a little confused:
China National Knowledge Infrastructure
The "copy ratio without citation" is easy to understand, which means to check the repetition rate after "removing the cited documents" in the paper. "Removing my published documents" should be the repetition rate after removing the cited documents, and my documents should also be included in the above "copy ratio without citation". What are these two intentions? Why is the percentage of the latter always higher than the former?
In fact, the main purpose of this duplicate checking system is to find that people who quote other people's words are unwilling to indicate their own names, and take other people's words as their own, which is plagiarism. So the so-called duplicate checking is a question of checking and not copying. Since both "cited documents" and "personal documents" are included in the list of elimination, it shows that these "cited documents" and "personal documents" are normative acts indicating the source, which can be repeated, of course, not too much, but the standards are difficult to quantify.
What kind of quotations are not copied? Is to quote someone else's words and indicate the source. When you need other people's things, you don't take them secretly, but borrow them. Performance in the text, secretly take how many words is plagiarism? Generally speaking, it is still relatively loose, and the copy ratio of "excluding cited documents" is below 15%, which barely passes the test. However, it should be pointed out that if an article quotes others, it will not work if it is quoted too much, because it is easy to copy other people's views if it is quoted too much. That is to say, if everything in your house is blatantly borrowed from your neighbor, can you say that everything in this house is yours? You only have the right to use, not the right to own. What is the significance of occupying these things?
Therefore, "removing the copy ratio of cited documents" means removing "quoting one's own words and indicating the source" and "quoting others' words and indicating the source", and removing the quotations of these norms. If there is repetition rate, it includes "quoting your own articles without indicating the source" and "quoting others without indicating the source", which are all irregular behaviors. Once the proportion is high, it is plagiarism.
In fact, the repetition rate of an original paper after "removing the copy ratio of cited documents" should be 0, but because the phenomenon of massive plagiarism in the world is too serious now, all scientific research departments will increase when checking the duplicate. This is that it is difficult to blame the law on the public. In the case that people's "illegal" phenomenon is too common, they have to be dealt with lightly and set new standards.
The repetition rate after "removing the copy ratio of my published documents" includes "citing other people's documents to indicate the source", plus "using my own published words without indicating the source" and "using other people's words without indicating the source" (it is also irregular to repeat my own published words without indicating the source). These three categories are non-standard citation behaviors, and the repetition rate is much higher than that after "removing the copy ratio of cited documents". Therefore, if there is repetition in the duplicate checking results, the repetition rate after "removing the copy ratio of my published documents" is always higher than that after "removing the copy ratio of cited documents".
The purpose of checking the repetition rate of "removing the copy ratio of cited documents" is to check the irregular behavior, and the main purpose of checking the repetition rate of "removing the copy ratio of my published documents" is to see how many articles are normative citations and irregular plagiarism besides citing my own documents. If the rate of non-standardization is low, the phenomenon that the so-called norms are cited from sources is serious, and we should also pay attention to it and correct it.
For example, the repetition rate of "excluding the copy ratio of cited documents" is 8.8%, so according to the current standards, such an article is not plagiarism, but should be regarded as irregular citation, as long as the source is added. The repetition rate of "excluding the copy ratio of my published documents" is 43%, so 43%-8.8% = 34.2%. Then this 34.2% is the repetition rate of quoting other people's literature, which is the standard repetition rate. However, this seemingly standardized repetition rate is too high, which means that too many quotations are also suspected of copying other people's written expressions. Therefore, if such an article is adopted, the author should not only indicate the sources of irregular citations, but also streamline and delete some documents with excessive citations.
It can be seen that the main purpose of checking the repetition rate of "removing the copy ratio of quoted documents" is to find out the irregular behavior of quoting other people's words but respecting other people's intellectual property rights, and whether to copy other people's opinions and written expressions. That is to say, the repetition rate after "removing the copy ratio of cited documents" includes all non-standard citation behaviors, and the repetition rate after "removing the copy ratio of published documents" includes non-standard and standardized citation behaviors. Therefore, the repetition rate of "removing the copy ratio of cited documents" is the most critical data to check plagiarism, and the search is based on this data, not the latter and the total data. At present, some units have deviations from the data.
There is also a statistical data with the highest number of repetitions of a single article, which can be used as a reference for too many "normative citations". No matter whether there are citations from sources or not, even if it is normative citations from one's own literature, it is not standard to repeat too many words. It may be that most of the published words and opinions are taken out and sent again, which may lead to actual duplication of work. Even if a new article is published, it is because of too much repetition.