Papers are often used to refer to articles that conduct research in various academic fields and describe academic research results, which are referred to as papers for short. It is not only a means to discuss problems in academic research, but also a tool to describe academic research results in academic exchanges. Including academic papers, graduation papers, dissertations, scientific papers, achievement papers and so on. The following is my carefully arranged teacher's comments on graduation thesis, which are welcome for your reference and I hope to help you.

To evaluate a graduation thesis, we should adhere to the grading standards and research writing methods, so as to achieve accurate grading, fair evaluation and standardization.

First, the standard of graduation thesis evaluation results

According to the relevant regulations, the grading results of graduation thesis can generally be divided into four grades: excellent, good, passing and failing. The specific standards of graduation thesis of Correspondence College of Central Party School are copied as follows for reference.

(1) Excellent

1, can correctly reflect the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, and can comprehensively apply the theories learned and the relevant knowledge of this major.

2, can closely contact the system, the department, the actual work of the unit. The analysis of the problem is correct and comprehensive, with certain depth or originality, which has certain guiding significance for practical work.

3. The center is prominent, the arguments are sufficient, the structure is rigorous, the level is clear, and the expression ability is strong.

4. Rich materials and reliable data can be processed by scientific methods.

(2) Good

1, can correctly reflect the relevant policies of the party and the state, and can better use the learned theories and professional knowledge.

2, can better contact with the actual work, the analysis of the problem is more correct and comprehensive, which has a certain reference function to guide the actual work.

3. The center is clear, the arguments are sufficient, the levels are clear, the sentences are fluent, and the expression ability is good.

4. The materials are rich, the data are basically reliable, and it can be well processed and sorted.

(3) Pass the exam

1, can correctly understand the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, has no principled mistakes in theory, and can basically master and apply the relevant knowledge learned in this major.

2. I can also connect with practical work, basically express my views, and have certain ability to analyze and solve problems. However, the analysis of the problem is superficial, or it can only list the phenomena, and the center is not prominent enough.

3. There are certain arguments, the main data are basically reliable, and the sentences are fairly smooth.

4. There are certain original materials, which have been processed and sorted out.

(4) failure.

Any of the following circumstances shall be deemed as unqualified.

1, violates the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, or commits a principled error in theory, and has a poor grasp of relevant professional knowledge.

2, the article has no center, unclear level, chaotic logic and unreasonable sentences.

3, the material is messy or the main data is distorted, and the processing is poor.

4. The main content is basically copying other people's achievements.

(five) any paper that plagiarizes the achievements of others or is written with the help of others, once found and verified, will be disqualified from review and defense.

First, we must strictly grasp the above evaluation criteria, and must not lower the standards or raise the scores; Second, we should adjust measures to local conditions, but at the same time, we should "make a bowl of water even" for the same group of students, and we should not adopt different standards for different people.

Second, the writing of comments.

There are two opinions on graduation thesis: one is the opinion of the tutor, and the other is the opinion of the defense Committee.

(A) the guidance of the tutor's opinion writing

Instructor's opinion mainly evaluates the whole paper from the perspective of writing. The evaluation points are as follows:

1, whether the viewpoint is correct and clear;

2. Whether the argument is sufficient;

3. Whether the analysis is comprehensive;

4. Whether the structure is reasonable;

5. Whether the statement is fluent;

6, whether there is practical guiding significance.

The following is a comment on the article "Reflections on Stopping the Phenomenon of Arbitrary Charges in Primary and Secondary Schools":

This paper can integrate theory with practice, comprehensively analyze the current phenomenon of unreasonable charges in primary and secondary schools and its causes, and put forward measures to stop it, which has certain reference function for practical work. The article has reasonable structure, clear organization, sufficient arguments and fluent sentences.

(two) the writing of the opinions of the defense committee

1, what is the attitude of defense;

2. Whether the thinking is clear;

3. Whether the answer is accurate;

4. Whether the language is fluent;

5. Is there any remedy for the deficiency of the original text?

The following are the opinions of the defense Committee on the graduation thesis of the 86th students of the Correspondence College of the Central Party School, which not only objectively evaluated the defense situation, but also affirmed the topic selection and originality of the thesis. Make necessary supplements to the opinions of the instructor.

This topic is a sensitive issue in the current theoretical circle, and there are few systematic and complete research results. The author's topic is bold and his writing intention is clear.

In the process of defense, the thinking is clear and logical, and the discussion on some issues has deepened.

The writing of graduation thesis comments should be concise, the attitude should be objective, the evaluation should be appropriate, and the praise and criticism should be measured. It should be pointed out that some graduation thesis comments (especially the defense opinions) are too simple and hasty to be desirable.

;