Yan Shi can't give an example of Gao Tu's argumentative essay:

Speaking of Mo Bosang, a critical realist writer, people always mention Flaubert, his strict teacher, and praise him with one voice: without Flaubert, Mo Bosang might not be the "prince of European novels". When people talk about the outstanding achievements of "five consecutive championships", they often praise the strict arrangement of the best coach Wei Yuan. Indeed, the famous saying that "a strict teacher makes a noble apprentice" has always been praised by people.

But can a "strict teacher" become a "high apprentice"? Don't!

Confucius, a great thinker and educator, is a saint. He has 3,000 disciples and 72 sages, but after all, he has no choice but to slaughter "Sleeping in the Day": "This boy is like mud that can't be pasted on the wall and rotten wood that can't be carved."

Pang Juan, reviled by the world, is not the disciple of the famous devil who can't bear to study hard at a cold window, pursue fame and fortune, play politics and murder his classmates?

Zhuge Liang can be said to have outstanding military talents. He helped Liu Bei build the country and did his best for Adou, but it didn't help after all.

If a "strict teacher" must be a "noble apprentice", there would be no such human beings as Zai Yu, Pang Juan and Adou in history. From this, we can easily find the truth that "strict teacher" is only an external reason and can only change external conditions; And "diligence" is the internal cause and the basis for the development and change of things. It's like no matter how heated the stone is, it won't hatch a chicken after all.

Although "strict teacher" is very important for becoming a "high student", the key to becoming a "high student" lies in the "disciple" itself and how the "disciple" listens to the pure teachings of "strict teacher" with an open mind and studies hard.

Therefore, we long for "strict teacher", but we must encourage ourselves to be a good disciple and a noble disciple!