The film Confucius is divided into two parts. One is the film itself, and the other is the promotion of the film.

As far as the film itself is concerned, I don't think I got 70 points. I passed because the story itself was clear, the actors worked hard, and the director created the atmosphere at that time, at least more reliable than the spring and autumn films such as Mo Chong.

The score is not high because the feeling is not so strong. Like a pot of tea, the water is a little cold and does not boil. The difference between a work and a good work lies in a little effort. Of course, it is a little difficult for Hu Mei to take the time to fully understand Confucius. When a director becomes famous, he is always eager for quick success and instant benefit. She was still learning a dream of red mansions before, and suddenly she changed it to the Analects of Confucius, jumping too much. No wonder spending on "seeing Nanzi" may be a sequela.

Confucius is really famous. There are 10,000 interpretations of famous sayings and aphorisms by 10,000 people. Therefore, it is not easy for him to cook this dish. Some people say that Hu Mei didn't serve well, but from the film itself, I don't believe anyone in the film circle can serve better. Hu Mei's perception level basically represents the perception level of the film circle. Do you believe Zhang Yimou can do it?

The movie "Confucius" caused such a great dislike, not Confucius himself, nor the movie itself, but outside the movie, or its promotion means. First, Brother Fage said, "Don't cry, it's not a person" and started kidnapping the audience. Subsequently, the relevant departments issued a ban, forcing Avatar, which had previously set a domestic box office record, to go offline. Although it is only 2D, how many 3D scenes are there in China? How many IMAX are there? It's like being completely offline.

Obviously, the forced off-line is to open the way for Confucius, under the bright banner of "protecting domestic films." That's not good. Domestic movies, foreign movies, and showing them in cinemas are all business. Doing business requires the higher authorities to talk, and those who are allowed to sell are not allowed to sell. Isn't this a power and money interest? Obviously, this is an abuse of power to intervene in the market. Confucius came with Tianwei, which really smacked of the feudal society's ousting of hundreds of schools and its exclusive respect for Confucianism. Many of Confucius' thoughts are noble, but unfortunately, they have been used by people for thousands of years, and people have been doing unjust things under the banner of nobility.

As far as movies are concerned, Confucius and Avatar can't be compared. The director of Avatar has been dormant for more than ten years. What about Hu Mei? "Avatar" is an explosion of imagination, and Confucius restores it step by step; For the audience, "Avatar" is of practical significance, while "Confucius" taught everyone to obey and escape, and taught everyone to be patient. This is a paradise, an underground. Of course, investment is also very different.

Different efforts lead to different results. Avatar has taken the lead, and it is inevitable that it will be sought after by the audience before the release of Confucius. It was a major mistake for Confucius to rob the Spring Festival. Now it is impossible to take the upper position by administrative means without causing resentment. Does the audience have to pay for the movie themselves and listen to the instructions of the relevant departments? Should a little fun in life be forcibly interrupted?

In this case, the crew or filmmakers should be extra cautious in their words and deeds, but who knows that Hu Mei said something even more wrong, such as Avatar's box office is not so good, such as warmth to protect domestic movies. Your temperature is very expensive.

As for propaganda, it is going further and further on the wrong road. The film announced that its website had been attacked. The attack came from another domestic film that will be released later. Many people speculated that it was "Royal Guards", but the result was refuted. Make enemies not only in front, but also behind, which makes everyone disgusted and besieged. Isn't it just shooting yourself in the foot to hype a movie that the relevant departments attach so much importance to with the hype of entertainment movies?

At this point, in this film, I can't see any concepts advocated by Confucius, such as "the benevolent loves others" and "don't do to others what you don't want others to do to you", and I can't see that "if you are near, you will respect the monarch, if you are filial, you will be loyal, and if you teach, you will not teach." The teaching of. What you see is rudeness, coercion and plunder. Now "News Network" is passively used for hype, and is organizing primary and secondary school students to go to the movies collectively to save its withered box office and shape the myth of 38 million. This is just giving up on yourself and making a mistake. I'm afraid it will become the laughing stock of people in the end.

Just like Confucius Institutes are being set up everywhere, just like Yu Dan's books are being sold everywhere, the film "Confucius" is just doing business to make money under the banner of Chinese studies or morality, hoping that people will obey and follow it to the death. If there is a deeper educational significance, this film tells us that some people's thinking has never changed, just like when they lambasted Kong Laoer more than 30 years ago.