In order to do a good job in the evaluation of senior positions of health technical personnel in our province and ensure the quality of evaluation, these measures are formulated in accordance with the relevant provisions of the evaluation and appointment of professional and technical positions in our province and in combination with the actual situation of the Health Department.

I. Objection

All health technical personnel who apply for the qualification of deputy senior positions are interviewed for business and reviewed or defended by papers. Among them, except those who apply for deputy senior positions at county (city) level and below, health technical personnel who are normally promoted to the qualification of deputy senior positions are reviewed by papers; Health technicians who do not have the required academic qualifications or have not completed the required service years (excluding clinicians) will make an exception to declare the defense papers for the qualifications of the deputy and senior positions.

Second, the method

(1) Introduce yourself

The applicant should first briefly introduce himself (including name, work unit, technical position, professional education, education background, major, etc.) to the members of the professional appraisal group. ), the time limit is about 3 minutes.

(2) Business interview

The applicant shall submit a summary of professional and technical work since taking office, including:

Length of business technical work (including the main business technical tasks undertaken and completed, expertise, complex business technical problems that can be solved, and the current level of business technical work, etc.). );

2 work performance (including publishing academic papers, obtaining scientific and technological achievements, publishing monographs and carrying out business and technical work, etc.). );

3 future work plan and development goals (including how to carry out the next business and technical work, as well as which subject areas to focus on research and development, etc.). ).

During the interview, the applicant briefly introduces his business and technical work, work performance and future work plan according to the summary requirements. The purpose of the interview is to understand the applicant's clinical or technical work experience and examine his ability to analyze, synthesize, judge and solve complex and difficult technical problems in his major. According to the requirements of the above principles and the applicant's business work, the professional appraisal team puts forward targeted questions, which are answered by the applicant, or the members of the professional appraisal team prepare test questions in advance (which can be comprehensive topics or medical record analysis, etc.). ), the applicant answers the questions. According to the interview, all members of the professional appraisal team comprehensively evaluated their professional technical level and practical work ability, and gave a score.

(3) Identification of documents

Applicants submit papers that best reflect their academic and technical level and achievements since taking office (limited to the first author). The submitted papers are reviewed by the professional review team, focusing on the purpose, methods, achievements and application value of the research, and then all members of the professional review team score according to the advanced, scientific and practical nature of the papers.

(4) thesis defense

Applicants should submit papers that can reflect their academic and technical level and achievements since taking office, and briefly introduce the purpose, methods, achievements and application value of the research, as well as its advanced, scientific and practical nature. The time limit is about 3 minutes. Then the members of the professional evaluation team put forward questions in a targeted manner and the applicants answered them one by one. According to the defense situation and the advanced, scientific and practical nature of the paper, all members of the professional appraisal group will score.

(five) the establishment of professional evaluation team approach

The professional evaluation team consists of 5 ~ 7 senior and deputy personnel with high technical level, certain authority, decent style and fair handling, with a team leader 1 person. The Provincial Health Department is responsible for the professional business interview and thesis review (defense) of the personnel who declare senior positions in the province and those who declare deputy senior positions in cities and districts without delegated review authority; Each district and city is responsible for the business interview and thesis review (defense) of the deputy senior staff who delegate the review authority.

(VI) Scoring method and comprehensive evaluation

Both business interview and thesis appraisal (defense) adopt anonymous scoring method. The percentage system is adopted for business interview and the 15 scoring system is adopted for thesis appraisal (defense). The scoring items are advanced, scientific and practical, with 5 points for each item. The grading criteria of the paper are as follows: 13.5 ~ 15 is excellent, 12 ~ 13.4 is good, 9 ~1.9 is passed, and below 8.9 is failed, with an average score. According to the results of business interview and paper review (defense), the professional review team will make comprehensive review opinions, which will be signed by the team leader after review.