The basic structure of argumentative writing; You can put forward the argument directly first, and then put forward the argument step by step to demonstrate the argument.
You can also talk about the event first, and the argument is triggered by the event, and then analogize the argument with similar viewpoints. For example, The Snake Catcher is a typical representative of this kind of argumentative paper.
In addition, it can also be a reasoning structure, which only talks about events and analogies, and does not take the initiative to put forward arguments, so that readers can feel the arguments themselves. The reason why A Dream of Red Mansions can make many people happy to study it is because its story itself has a strong discussion value, but the author has not clearly put forward an absolute argument, which leads readers to be willing to study it in depth and make their own inferences.
Finally, the argumentative topic is reasonable and standardized.
When writing argumentative topics, we should pay attention to the fact that argumentative topics must reflect the genre of the article, and we must not mention some topics similar to prose or narrative.
Generally speaking, there are two ways to write it: the first topic indicates the scope of the article. For example, talk about ideals, talk about courage, talk about cherishing time, talk about hard work, talk about patriotism and so on.
The second topic is argumentation. This way of writing captures the central theme of the material. For example, unity is strength, learn to cooperate, value reason over literature, and patriotism requires dedication and hard work.
This way of writing can best reflect the author's point of view. When we read People's Daily, we found that many political papers were written in this way. Argumentation is to show the author's point of view. The title is a good starting point.