After a paper is submitted, it usually goes through the process of first draft, review and finalization, but no one knows what this process is like. The review time of journals at different levels is different, especially the core time is the longest, about half a year. It may even be postponed for some reason. The first draft of the manuscript is reviewed by the editor-in-chief of the magazine, then by the experts, then by the editor-in-chief, and finally the paper can be published. In this process, the first draft is a filtering process. Generally, the first draft can be passed without any major problems, and the most important thing is the review by experts and editors. Regardless of the level of regular journals, experts and editors who review manuscripts are well-known in the industry, or experts and scholars are responsible. The first is the experience and education of experts, especially the experience of experts is the most important. Secondly, it is the serious and responsible attitude of experts to peer review. Third, it is the peer review level of experts. Of course, the reviewer's academic qualifications and experience are different, and the review conclusion of a paper will be different. However, different angles of experts' reviewing manuscripts will lead to highly different evaluations of manuscripts. As an expert and scholar in a certain industry, you should have a comprehensive understanding of the academic trends and technical level of your major. The expert review mainly examines the contents of the paper, such as whether the viewpoints of the paper are correct, whether the principles, formulas, derivation processes and conclusions adopted are correct, whether the experimental data are different from foreign literature, and whether the references are up-to-date. To some extent, expert peer review is a correct evaluation of the academic level, technical level, innovation and advancement of the paper.
When reviewing manuscripts, experts must conduct a comprehensive and detailed review of the contents reflected in academic papers, such as arguments, experimental processes, results and discussions, conclusions, etc. Experts should calm down, think seriously and rationally about different academic viewpoints and arguments, give correct and appropriate evaluation to the paper, and never speculate on the academic value of the paper. The specific method is as follows:
1. Political censorship. Politically, it mainly examines eight aspects: national territory and sovereignty; National dignity; Party's principles and policies; Foreign-related issues; Religious issues; Historical issues; Confidentiality issues; Other political issues.
2. Innovative comments. Innovation mainly refers to the new contribution of papers to human knowledge, technology or thought. The analysis methods and approaches are roughly as follows:
3. Source analysis of the paper: With strict approval of fund projects and good financial support, the paper may be more innovative.
4. Author information analysis: The quality of new works by recognized high-level authors may be good, because the research is inherited, and the quality of papers is positively related to the quality of authors.
6. Analysis: Papers with clear and novel topics, complete experimental process and data, fully typical arguments, rigorous arguments and clear conclusions are generally more innovative.
After reviewing the papers, many papers need to be revised, and each article is typed back for its own reasons. As an author, when receiving the opinions of reviewers, we should first straighten our minds and keep calm. This is to be done: 1. All questions should be answered one by one; 2. Try to satisfy the experiments that need to be supplemented in the opinions; 3. Don't avoid what you can't meet, and explain reasonable reasons for what you can't do; 4。 For those who disagree, we should also answer tactfully and skillfully, so as to be well-founded; 5. Literature recommended by reviewers must be cited and discussed.
Publish a paper and choose to be paper net to take you to experience the service! 100% of the recommended publications are official, and illegal publications, special issues, supplements and supplements with suffixes are never recommended. Open the green fast track (some periodicals can be expedited), 1-3 days to review manuscripts quickly, 1-3 months to read periodicals quickly!