Professionals are more adaptable to social competition. They should learn healthy competition to open their own way. There are many hidden traps in the workplace. People in the workplace are more adaptable to social competition and workplace.
Professionals are more adaptable to social competition 1 Viewpoint 1: Modern society needs professionals more.
1. Professionals meet the requirements of modern social science division of labor.
Scientific division of labor is an inevitable requirement for the benign development of today's society. In the professional field, experts have profound knowledge and more skilled skills. Compared with generalists, they can have a more solid foundation and better completion ability, thus meeting the requirements of scientific division of labor in modern society.
Second, expertise can lead the innovation of modern society.
With the development of society, it is necessary to break through innovation if you want to develop. Professionals are more likely to cooperate with professionals in other disciplines to innovate or make breakthroughs in their own fields. Compared with generalists, more professionals stand at the forefront of the discipline and master the most cutting-edge technology. Professionals have targeted and professional knowledge, and it is easier to acquire and absorb new in-depth knowledge in their own fields, and they are good at digging deep into existing products for local improvement and innovation.
Third, professionals are even more irreplaceable in modern society.
Social division of labor is deep and needs to be refined in social production and innovation. In specific social work, a lot of knowledge and details are not easily handed over by ordinary people, and the vertical and in-depth development of society is built by these professionals. If society is compared to a big machine, then professionals are gears and generalists are lubricants. We also need lubricants, but a machine without gears and only lubricants can't run.
Summary: Professionals have in-depth knowledge and more skilled skills. Compared with all-rounders, they have a more solid foundation and better completion ability. The generalist is most afraid of this dilemma. There is an old saying that there is a cloud industry and specialization, and now there is a skill to go global, which shows that professionals are irreplaceable.
Viewpoint 2: Modern society needs more generalists.
1. With the continuous advancement of social development, the demand for talents is no longer limited to just a little professional knowledge, but more attention is paid to the evaluation of the comprehensive quality of talents.
Second, with the continuous refinement of social division of labor, a large part of the service industry in the future will be intelligent and directly controlled by computer systems, so your professional skills are likely to be replaced by robots at this time.
Third, people who pay attention to current events can easily find that generalists are more favored by this society. For example, which star in the entertainment circle is not "versatile"?
Nowadays, young people start their own businesses. If they don't agree, they will be their own bosses. I think this is not only the slogan of "mass entrepreneurship and innovation" and the further improvement of relevant preferential policies, but also the continuous improvement of the comprehensive ability of contemporary youth. "One person is worth a thousand people".
5. The more diversified and high-quality material means of subsistence and spiritual consumer goods needed by all-rounders will undoubtedly promote social and economic development and innovation at the talent level.
Professionals are more adaptable to social competition.
All-rounder refers to the all-round development of talents, and is a compound talent with a wide range of knowledge. Professionals refer to people who have more professional knowledge and more skilled professional skills in a certain professional field on a certain knowledge platform. When discussing who is more suitable for social competition, we need to pay attention to the fact that generalists and professionals are two concepts, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, which makes our debate very meaningful. Moreover, these two concepts have their own emphasis, one in the whole and the other in the special. Among them, there is a concept of specialization and multifunction, but this should not be the focus of debate. Omnipotence is unrealistic and impossible. In this debate, everything is about profoundness. What we want to demonstrate is that a deep understanding of knowledge in a certain field is more suitable for social competition than extensive knowledge. Here we are not comparing "many" and "one", but comparing "all" and "essence". The so-called adaptation to social competition lies in adapting to the needs of society. Only those who meet the needs of society are more competitive. In today's information explosion era, the demand for talents is getting higher and higher. We think professionals are more suitable for social competition.
First, with the refinement of social division of labor, the knowledge structure corresponding to the division of labor is becoming more and more detailed, so the specialty is also developing in a more complicated direction. The demand for talents tends to be more detailed and higher, so the demand for talent specialization is very obvious.
Second, professionals with professional knowledge and skills in a certain field will be more attractive than all-rounders. In the compound cross field, the final research and implementation is also realized in a single field. Because the generalist's personal work efficiency is low, focusing on the personal field is more conducive to realizing social value.
Third, adapting to social competition lies in adapting to social needs, and the relationship between talents and society is a two-way choice. All-rounder has a wide range of choices, but it can only be selected once, which is uncertain. "Opportunities can be met by everyone, but not everyone can cash them." All-round and extensive is just a show-off capital, and a modern society with a detailed division of labor needs sophisticated talents, that is, professionals.
To sum up, we think professionals are more suitable for social competition.
First of all, I think there is something wrong with your topic. What are specialist and generalist? Since he is called a generalist, he must also involve the talents of professionals, otherwise he will not be called a generalist. It's like Han Han going to the college entrance examination with a miyoshi student. Needless to say, the result must be that Miyoshi students have been admitted to an ideal university, and Han Han can only dream of the Spring and Autumn Period with his unforgettable articles, hoping that the principal can be kind enough to enter the school without an exam. Isn't that clear enough? A generalist must be more adaptable to the competition in this society than an expert. Because a generalist has at least a more stable psychological quality to bear setbacks than a specialist. Without a sound psychological quality, it is difficult for you to stand in this society. Imagine that you can expect a person who will be depressed and easily hurt himself because of setbacks to achieve better results, which is why the China team, which won many gold medals in the Olympic Games, stressed that its players should keep a good attitude.
I think the question raised by the other side deviates from the focus of the debate. According to what you said, the psychological quality of knowledgeable people is definitely good, and the psychological quality of professionals is poor. I'm afraid we can't agree to this, can we?
Besides, Han Han, if his article is good, isn't it a good way for him to write? The so-called "365 lines, each doing its own thing" gave him a good way out. If he is really an expert in fussing. Then he should do a good job in this "expert" position. There are many writers who can make a living by writing and base themselves on society. If he really becomes an expert in writing. So is it necessary to squeeze a wooden bridge to go to school? College is specialized and can adapt to society better!
Does modern society need generalists or professionals more? It depends on who can better promote the benign operation and sustainable development of modern society. The so-called professional talents refer to talents with richer professional knowledge and more skilled professional skills in a certain professional field. The so-called generalist is a talent with broad knowledge platform, rich knowledge reserves and diverse skills. Simply put, a generalist means comprehensive knowledge, diverse skills and strong ability to adapt to changes.
All right! Talking about modern society, benign operation and sustainable development are the primary requirements of modern society. A high degree of division of labor is a remarkable feature of modern society. However, a high degree of integration is a major and urgent requirement of modern society. Social division of labor has caused refinement, but if the fragments produced by refinement are not integrated, where can we find the benign operation and sustainable development of the whole society? Every step of social division of labor brings higher integration requirements. Is it necessary to communicate between different divisions of labor at this time? Is it necessary to integrate different disciplines? Then, a generalist with a broad knowledge platform and rich knowledge reserves and a specialist with only a single skill and knowledge can better communicate between different divisions of labor? Who can fully integrate different disciplines? Therefore, the benign operation and sustainable development of modern society need more generalists!
Second, let's look at the motive force of modern social development-innovation. From the synthesis of ancient science to the differentiation of modern science, and then to the new synthesis of today's science. The situation of strict barriers and fragmentation of disciplines no longer exists. What we see is the exchange, blending and infiltration of various disciplines. Today, the significance of innovation lies in the meeting, exchange, integration and synthesis of different ideas, different fields and different disciplines here. So is the generalist with wide caliber and thick foundation more innovative than the generalist with narrow caliber? Therefore, the breakthrough and progress of modern society need more generalists.
Thirdly, let's take a look at a realistic problem in modern society-the frequent flow of talents. Americans have to change jobs seven or eight times in their lives. With the continuous progress of China's market economy and the deepening of industrial structure adjustment and professional structure adjustment, we find that the flow of talents across industries and fields is becoming more and more frequent. At this time, is a generalist with multiple skills better able to adapt to the changes of modern society than a generalist with only one skill? To sum up, we find that whether from a macro social perspective or a micro personal perspective, it can prove that what modern society needs more is a generalist!
Professionals are more adaptable to social competition. 3. The enterprise is not only specialized in producing a certain product.
Let's look at global enterprises. Which big enterprise specializes in making a certain product? No. Even some clothing manufacturers have to constantly develop new markets, new brands and new styles. Designers must also understand the preferences of different cultures, the rise and fall of trends and the profits of business. Therefore, many famous designers themselves will have all kinds of knowledge, such as architecture, music, painting, history and so on. If an enterprise only makes one product, it will have to close its business as long as the social demand changes. On the contrary, if he can develop horizontally, focus on the original products of the enterprise, constantly develop peripheral products, and then develop into another series of goods, and continue to develop, he can always be linked with the society and the market, and he can also remain competitive.
Enterprises are like this, especially talents. When the economy is good, a professional may get a corresponding return, because the company has abundant funds and doesn't care about one or two more people; But when the economy is poor, when the company wants to remove some employees and cut costs, the first thing is professionals, because he is only responsible for some of them, but his salary will certainly not be less than others. Imagine that I take care of two top professionals and hire a generalist to take care of their affairs with 80% of one's salary. Do you think this is good for the company? If you think that this generalist can only do 80% of those two professionals, well, I'll hire three generalists with the salary of two professionals. Do you think two professionals or three all-rounders will bring more efficiency if you simply use mathematics to calculate? On the contrary, an all-rounder has better job opportunities even when the economy is in recession. What about professionals? Needless to say. Therefore, in this era, generalists can adapt to social competition better than professionals.
The top management of EA, a big game company, is a graduate of a famous American business school, but at the same time, he is also a gamer and has a good knowledge and understanding of games. Only in this way can he lead the company to keep pace with the times in market sales and game quality, which not only makes the game get considerable returns in various sales areas, but also makes gamers in various regions praise the quality of its products.
On the contrary, Orange, a game company in Taiwan Province Province, started as a paradise selling in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, but it only focused on game talents, ignoring the market sales and the incomprehension of players in different regions, so Paradise was a fiasco in the United States, another game was called junk game in Japan, and Giants has now become a free game in Taiwan Province and Hong Kong. The company went public at the hottest time, and its share price has been rising, but now it is falling. Fortunately, orange has been recruiting business talents for many years before it can be retained. However, its vitality has been greatly damaged, which is the shortcoming of incompleteness.
society
Social posts are limited, professionals will inevitably hang themselves from a tree, and all talents can adapt to social changes more quickly. After all, learning takes time, and opportunities only belong to those who are ready at any time. This seems to be a justified reason. But we have stepped out of the era of simple mechanized mass production. Don't the employees you hire understand the overall situation and division of labor and cooperation?
The cruelty of competition makes everyone feel a sense of crisis. One more technology means one more capital, while knowledge is interlinked, and each technology is actually complementary. Even if you only use one technology now, a wide knowledge base will make you better use and apply that technology and make you more creative. Society needs innovation. Today's innovations often come from interdisciplinary and marginal disciplines. Therefore, generalists have more innovative advantages than professionals.
As the saying goes: multi-skills don't drag you down. Society needs people with broad knowledge platforms. We need to adapt to society. Everything is good for society. People with broad caliber and strong foundation have strong innovation ability. A generalist is more adaptable to social competition. Only a generalist can deal with all aspects of society. Only when they are like a duck to water in the tide of society can they easily cope with difficult problems and learn more.
Compared with experts, generalists have a wide range of knowledge and a high degree of knowledge integration. In addition, in his knowledge structure, there are various professional knowledge and skills that support the core competitiveness. Extensive knowledge does not mean omniscient, on the contrary, he has the conditions to achieve everything; In order to reach the top professional level in a certain aspect, he must first ensure that he has a broad knowledge base. The development of contemporary society is changing with each passing day, the requirements for talents are getting stricter and stricter, and the power of knowledge is getting more and more shocking!
The so-called women are afraid of marrying the wrong person, and men are afraid of entering the wrong line. Don't we have one more choice and one more opportunity to adapt to the development of modern society? Social division of labor is definitely not that one person can only do this, but that one person can do this as long as he has the ability. Or is it limited to his skills? So isn't seeking knowledge more suitable for the needs of society than seeking expertise?
Let's take a look at a realistic problem in modern society-the frequent flow of talents. Americans have to change jobs seven or eight times in their lives. With the continuous progress of China's market economy and the deepening of industrial structure adjustment and professional structure adjustment, we find that the flow of talents across industries and fields is becoming more and more frequent. At this time, is a generalist with multiple skills more adaptable to the changes of modern society than a generalist with only one skill?