First, the writer's self-revision.
In the revision of SCI papers, the main undertaker of the research usually begins to write in the process of sorting out and analyzing the experimental and investigation data. In the process of writing, the author himself and the correspondent (usually the head of the research group) will also participate. Most of them can form the first draft soon after the data analysis is completed.
After the first draft of SCI paper is completed, the author must calm down and check and modify the content, style and format of SCI paper before submitting it, so as to improve the quality of SCI paper and avoid making some unnecessary mistakes. A high-quality SCI paper often needs to be revised several times. Even though many authors are waiting for magazines after submitting their articles, there is no news. How long will it take to receive a reply? In fact, reading articles does not meet the requirements of magazines. If it is not much different from the magazine requirements, the speed will be very fast. If there is a big difference, magazines may spend more time on height. Let's take a look at the reasons why there has been no reply after submission.
1, learn about the review cycle.
The review period of most journals is 1-3 months. If it is a core journal, it may take longer. The long review time shows that the magazine has strict requirements for articles, and it also shows that the requirements for articles are higher. If you don't reply for a long time, the article may be repaired or brushed off.
2. Judging from the quality of the article.
If an article is innovative, it means there are minor problems elsewhere. Repeated revision and submission will definitely delay the review cycle. Therefore, more attention should be paid to the details before submission, which will affect the publication time. If it is used to evaluate professional titles, it is easy to miss the time.
3. From the choice of periodicals.
Many people want to choose a high-quality periodical, which is excellent in impact factors, periodical grade and influence. As a result, the journal receives a lot of manuscripts, but those in the editorial department are likely to lead to a long time for reviewing manuscripts. Of course, I don't want you to submit fake journals or cover journals. I just want to tell you that if you are in a hurry to use articles, you can also choose comprehensive and regular journals to contribute according to your own conditions. It is difficult for an experienced author to finalize it at one time.
Second, partners participate in the revision.
How to add points in the evaluation of professional titles? As the bonus items of academic achievements, evaluating professional titles and publishing papers have different bonus rules in every place. I'll tell you most of the situation today, hoping to help you.
1. First of all, the paper points are related to the paper grade and are divided into the following categories.
① retrieval of international authoritative academic journals: SCI? SSCI？ EI？ Foreign periodicals included in ISTP refer to foreign periodicals with international standard serial number (ISSN);
② Professional Core Journals: China Science and Technology Core Journals, Peking University Core Journals, Nantah Core Journals, Statistical Source Core Journals, etc. , retrieved and included by core journals;
(3) National academic journals: journals with international standard serial number (ISSN) and domestic uniform serial number (CN);
Based on the above analysis, the higher the paper grade, the more points you get.
2. Different industries have different professional title evaluation scores. How to add points?
① The total score of professional titles is generally 100, and the highest score for papers is 10, and there are also 8 points, 7 points and 6 points. In most cases, the scores of R&D papers are higher than those of non-R&D papers, for example, the highest score of R&D papers in engineering technology is 8, and the highest score of non-R&D papers in engineering technology is 6.
② The scores of the first author, the second author and the third author decrease in turn, and the position at the back is generally one point lower than the position at the front. General foreign publications can get 10-8 points, national publications (publications with international standard serial number (ISSN) and domestic uniform serial number (CN)) can get 6-4 points, provincial publications can get 5-3 points, prefecture (city) publications can get 4-2 points, and internal publications can get 2- 1 8 points.
The process of scientific research is usually complicated, and we often choose several collaborators to discuss this topic together. Then after the first draft is formed, you should send the first draft of the SCI paper to your collaborators for reading. Because each collaborator has different educational background and work experience, they can read SCI papers from their own perspective and find problems that the author failed to find, including constructive suggestions on analysis methods, interpretation of results and expression of SCI papers. Some collaborators can even directly help modify SCI papers and improve the quality of SCI papers.
Thirdly, the SCI paper is revised after submission.
The first step is about the structure of the article. To adjust the structure of the article, the structure should be clear, but the original structure of the article should be respected, otherwise it may become more and more chaotic.
The second step is the data about the article. In order to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of the data, we should delete those vague data and cases appropriately. If the data is insufficient, you need to find relevant data to supplement it.
The third step is to integrate and revise the materials of the paper again. Get rid of the rough and the fine, get rid of the false and keep the true. Integrate the cited materials so that they can concisely and accurately support the viewpoints of the paper. Views that cannot support the article should be deleted drastically, otherwise the paper will be lengthy. For articles with insufficient evidence, we should look for sufficient proof materials again. Be sure to ensure the authenticity of quoted data and famous sayings.