Perhaps only after experience can we know whether it is important or not. University is the epitome of a society. We will see many social phenomena in universities. When you are strong, natural contacts will come.

In college, students with good grades play together, students with mixed clubs play together, and entrepreneurs play together. Break into small groups. Except for roommates, the circles you mix are all oriented to your own development direction. This is involuntary. This is involuntary. It's ripe naturally.

Networking, useful but not all success. As the saying goes, it is easy to rely on parents at home and friends when going out. With many friends, the road is easy. But the premise of networking is that you must have some value yourself. Although there are not many conflicts of interest in universities, contacts are only useful in society. If you achieve nothing in society, no matter how many contacts you have, you will still be worthless, because you can't give full play to your greatest value and make yourself successful. The value of personal relationship plays a role on the premise of its own value.

In college, if you have contacts, you can really help a lot of things, but it doesn't matter if you don't have words, because some friends in college may have no contact after they leave the society, and others may not help you. So there is no need to spend too much time on some casual friends, but to concentrate on learning.

Real contacts are based on "equivalent exchange": you and the other party are at the same level, and you can provide equal resources to help and support each other, instead of just asking for it unilaterally, he only pays it unilaterally. Therefore, what kind of network resources do you want, you must first become that person, not absolutely the same, at least not too much difference.