How to evaluate scientific research papers (level evaluation)

A research paper is a written summary of scientific research work and the author's labor achievement, so be careful when commenting on research papers. Because publishing an article in a periodical is determined by many factors, an article that is not accepted for publication is by no means bad, because in addition to the factors of the article itself, there are also the direction of running a periodical, the interest and focus of editors, the limitation of space and various factors that need to be taken care of.

1. Comment on research questions

The evaluation of the paper first depends on whether the topic selected by the researchers is meaningful, and a good research topic is the basis of a valuable paper. Specifically:

(1) See whether the questions raised are of research value and whether the research content is instructive.

Significance, whether the research results can be applied to practice.

(2) whether the idea of the paper is innovative and whether it repeats the work of others, even if

Even the same theme should be constantly added with new contents and new methods.

(3) See whether the incidence of research problems is high and whether the problems are universal.

(4) Whether the topic of the paper is specific, distinctive, accurate and attractive.

2. Comment on research methods and results

The scientific nature of the paper lies in whether the research results are repetitive, that is, whether the research results can be repeated according to the methods described in the paper. Therefore, the scientific nature of scientific research papers largely depends on the scientific attitude in the process of scientific research design. Judging the materials and methods in the paper depends on whether the introduction is detailed and concrete, and whether it is convenient for others to repeat or choose to compare.

3. Comment on the discussion and conclusion.

The last part of the paper is the essence of the whole paper, which depends on whether the author's reasoning conforms to the law of logical thinking, whether it is convincing, whether the whole scientific research content is scientific and reliable, and whether the summarized experience can rise to theory or produce new ideas. Academic papers are argumentative, so the article must emphasize rationality and make the Taoist theory in the logical reasoning part clear-cut, thorough and profound, with explanatory power, so as to reflect the author's scientific research level and writing knowledge level.

4. Literariness

Scientific papers are applied styles, and the writing language should be concise and the materials should be true.

Shit, pay attention to the accurate application of words. Scientific papers are also scientific works.

In the expression of words, it is more special to be rigorous and realistic, and the wording should not be ambiguous.

Yes The article should be fluent and easy to understand, and the structure of the full text should be coherent and interactive.

Attention should be paid to rhetoric to make the problem clearer, and to the exact same words or

Don't repeat words too much, think about words repeatedly, and don't be unclear and inaccurate.

This place. Writing a paper is for communication, and the article is too monotonous to attract reading.

Interest. After the article is written, it should be revised constantly, so that the writing of the paper is not just science.

Sex, and pay attention to literature.

5. Experience in writing scientific papers

(1) A solid basic language skill is the first condition.

Including grammar (syntax, morphology) and basic vocabulary.

(2) Read more English papers and books.

(3) Contribute more papers and read more evaluation results.

Experience: vote for meetings, then for periodicals.

(4) the principle of language use:

The language that can properly express ideas is the language that should be used.

(5) The role of model essay in writing.

(6) abstract, introduction and conclusion

(7) Revision of the manuscript. "Articles never tire of changing"

Whenever we read the full text-and we never get tired of reading this article-we will read it.

If you find something that needs to be revised, you will feel that after some revisions, the article

The quality is further improved. The author is writing a paper and creating literature.

In the process of writing, I have a deep understanding of this. The author is revising and polishing it.

In addition to correcting typos and punctuation, we should also pay attention to

Whether the words convey the meaning, whether the sentences are fluent, concise and clear, and whether the titles are hierarchical.

The details are appropriate. More importantly, are the relevant parameters and contents accurate?

Whether it is practical and realistic, and whether the whole paper clearly explains the needs of the paper in detail.

The central idea of the discussion never digress, even deviate from Wan Li.

technical matters

1, long sentences and uncommon words should not be used.

2. The subject-slave complex sentence must have both clauses and main clauses.

3. Correct use of singular and plural nouns

A. Some common nouns do not have plural numbers.

Such as evidence, information and documents.

B. Nouns in some phrases must be plural:

At different temperatures;

In various ways;

At high temperature (low temperature), etc.

4. intransitive verbs cannot be used in passive voice.

If unavailable: appear, occupied, etc.

5. Elliptic words should not be used. No, you shouldn't wait.

6.s can only be used to express all the relationships between people and animals.

Expressions such as the activity of catalysts should not be used.