You can only feel what you can't express, and everyone's feelings are unique. Many times people have a very clear understanding of their feelings, but if you want to tell others about your feelings, there is no way to describe them, which is why you can only feel what you can't express.

I can only feel it, but I can't express it in words. 1 means that I can only try to figure it out with my heart and can't express it in words.

This sentence comes from Taoist philosophy, which usually means that the truth is mysterious and difficult to explain. Sometimes it also means that the situation is subtle and inconvenient to explain.

Can only understand, can't explain. Pinyin: [zh ǐ né ng yü hu, bênéng yán chuan].

Source: "Zhuangzi Tiandao": "Those who are agreeable can't be described in words."

Antonym: It can only be expressed, but not understood. It means that the literal meaning is clear, but it is difficult to imagine and understand, such as mathematical formulas.

For example, the amount of writing is short and long, and there is no certain law, but there is a certain beauty that can be understood, but it cannot be expressed. -Qing Liu Dakui's Essay

It looks amazing, the words can only be understood, but there are many conditions, which are nothing more than a kind of communication.

For two people who understand, the necessary psychological condition is that they must have the same experience or the experience of something that can be understood, otherwise there is no way to understand. Generally speaking, it is the so-called "tacit understanding". For example, playing basketball with a good friend can tell at a glance whether the other person wants to pass, break through or shoot. Needless to say, this is because you usually have a good relationship and often play basketball together, so you have a psychological basis of "understanding". Of course, if you are a stranger, maybe you can "understand". This is because you all play basketball and are familiar with the rules of basketball. Under what circumstances, what the other person does shows that you know what to do next, but the success rate of this "understanding" is definitely not as high as that of a good friend.

For the external environment, the necessary condition is that the situation at that time is not suitable for expressing the core views in a short time. For example, in a meeting, the boss starts to talk big, and then you and your colleagues "spit" the boss and start drawing cakes. In this case, you have no conditions to "spit" in detail, you can only understand and can't say it. However, when we go out to eat together afterwards, we may use words to make more detailed spit. For example, when talking to someone about some sensitive words, it is not convenient to express them in words, so you can only say "you know". So I think under the current conditions, this can only mean simple communication.

So why do we think it's amazing what we can say beyond words? In my opinion, this simple communication is very efficient, because it not only saves cognitive resources (no need to explain anything, no need to think about how to say it, no need to mobilize mouth muscles), but also conveys necessary information. We human beings have always been cognitive misers, and our favorite thing to do is to be lazy, so this kind of communication can often bring a good experience.

Can only feel but can't explain. Some things can only be experienced but cannot be explained.

Laozi said: Tao can be Tao, but extraordinary. As long as it falls into language, it is a lie.

Why? Because people who know the truth don't know it in the form of news. Otherwise, we can easily transmit this information to anyone who is ready to accept it, but truth can only be truly understood as an inner experience. It's like tasting with your tongue. If someone has never tasted the sweetness, you can never explain it to him-it's impossible. If someone has never seen color, you can't explain to him what color is.

Some things can only be explained from experience if they have been experienced. God is the supreme experience, which cannot be expressed, transmitted or revealed at all. You can use a few metaphors at most: but these metaphors can only be received by a very sensitive heart, otherwise you will still miss them.

Trying to interpret these metaphors with your mind will only make you miss their original meaning even more. Because when interpreting, what else can your mind use as a basis? The mind can only comment on its own past, its own confusion, its own conflict, doubt and confusion. And the mind will impose all this on the truth, cover up the hints you get, and then everything will be distorted immediately. Your mind is not in a state where you can simply observe and feel.

Religion only means creating a spiritual space in your mind, so that you can see it, do not conflict with each other, become an inseparable individual, be complete, thoroughly understand the truth and truly feel. A thoughtful mind can't really feel it; Those thoughts will continue to interfere. Those ideas are there layer after layer. Even if someone who knows the truth gives you some metaphors, you should pay attention to them. In fact, these words were not that person's intention before the deepest core in your heart was touched. What you receive with all your thoughts is completely different from what people who know the truth convey. Totally different.

The Buddha often repeats a metaphor three times. Someone asked him, "why did you repeat the same metaphor three times?" 」

He said, "Even three times is not enough. When I first said it, you only heard words. Words are empty, just empty shells, with no connotation. You didn't catch the meaning the first time. The second time you heard the meaning of the text, a fragrance came to your face, but first you were strongly shocked, and you were fascinated by the fragrance. You can't understand this state. You heard it, but you didn't understand it. So I'm going to repeat it three times

I keep repeating it over and over again just because you sleep so deeply, so I will repeat it over and over again and hit you. I hope that at a certain moment, a rare moment, you won't sleep so hard. At that time, you may have been half asleep, very close to the edge of waking up, and then something can enter your inner self. You may be able to hear it then. Yes, sometimes you are very close to waking up-you are not awake, but you are not sleeping, just somewhere in between, somewhere in between. 」

Everyone has had this experience: there are some moments in the morning when you are awake, but you are still awake. You can't say you're awake. You can vaguely hear birds, milkman, wife talking to neighbors, children getting ready for school, the sound of cars and the sound of trains passing by-but it's only vague, not complete, only half asleep and half awake. Then you fell asleep again. Suddenly you hear the sound of a train passing by, and suddenly you sleep deeper.

Now sleep researchers say that this happens continuously during your sleep: if you sleep for eight hours, you are not in the same sleep depth continuously, and your sleep depth changes constantly, from peak to trough. Up and down all night. Sometimes you are in a dreamless sleep, and sometimes you have been dreaming. Sometimes you are on the verge of waking up. If something falls and breaks at this moment and scares you, you will wake up and suddenly wake up.

This is the work of the Buddhas: wait for the moment when you are very close to waking up, then gently push you, then your eyes will open and you will see.

You can't explain God, but you can see God and experience God-but you can't explain it. Any explanation of God will only make people less and less aware of God; Therefore, the more priests, theologians and professors in the world, the less religious they are-because these people have been explaining God, but God cannot be explained. They fill your heart with so many explanations, and now these explanations themselves contradict each other. It's almost impossible to figure out what is what. You're completely confused. Humans have never been trapped in such a big mess, because humans have never been so close to each other. The earth has become a village, a global village.

In ancient times, Buddhists only knew what the Buddha said, Muslims only knew what Muhammad said, and Christians only knew Jesus. Now we have become the inheritors of the whole human heritage. Now you know Jesus, Zarathustra, Socrates, Buddha, Mahavira, Laozi, and hundreds of other explanations and metaphors-all of which are jumping around in your mind. It's really hard to pull you out of this mess now. The only possible way is to discard all these sounds, not some but all. This is my message.

Without those voices, you won't lose Jesus, Muhammad or Buddha; Throw away those voices, and then you will be closer to them. If you abandon those voices, you will only lose the priest, the tradition, the custom and all kinds of exploitation imposed on you under the guise of the traditional custom. Look at all this clearly, forget the Bible, forget the Buddhist scriptures and forget the Buddhist scriptures, and you will enter a clear and pure state. Yes, you need a clear spring to wash your mind, and you need to completely reduce the burden on your heart. Only then, in that quiet, can you understand.

I can only feel that I can't explain it in words, and I can't explain it in words.

You can only feel with your heart, but you can't express it in words. From Liu Dakui's prose in Qing Dynasty: "The length of prose is irregular, vivid, understandable and unspeakable."

Others can only get the message, but they can't express their communication in words. The text "Heaven in Zhuangzi": "Those who follow the will are unspeakable." Gaohe deviant lawsuit: "In the scope that the law should avoid, it does not include the question of Dean He, and it can only be understood but not expressed. This kind of thing that everyone knows clearly and can't be proved can't hurt President He at all. " △ It is mostly used to describe the content that the heart understands and the language cannot communicate.

Word decomposition:

Oral explanation. Expressed or conveyed in words. "Zhuangzi Heaven": "The meaning of language is expensive, and the meaning follows. Those who follow the meaning cannot be explained in words. " Qing Pu Songling's Strange Tales from a Lonely Studio, Heng Niang: "It's unspeakable to do what you like." Ba people's "Bitset No Dispute": "Poetry

Historical allusions recommendation: guide according to the situation

It's best to play it by ear. "Han Shu. It was handed down by my consorts. Empress Xu: "The secular times are different and change with the times. Adapt to the times and change with the times. The old one is wrong, how to put it! " On the contrary, according to different things, formulate corresponding measures. "Hanshu consorts filial piety queen Xu": "The secular times are different and change at any time.