First of all, preface:

1. The preface includes the origin, purpose, significance, main methods and scope of the topic, including literature review in a certain research field. This paper puts forward the present situation of this research field at home and abroad, the achievements made by predecessors, the knowledge gaps and problems left behind, and the problems that have not been solved or need to be solved urgently, thus leading to my own research motivation and significance.

2. To study the problems to be solved, so as to put forward new arguments and point out the advanced, scientific, theoretical significance and application value of this research work. The analysis method of dissertations generally follows two procedures, one is logical analysis procedure, and the other is system synthesis procedure. It is better to adopt system synthesis procedure, which has the function of constructing strategic position from strategic position and sketching outline.

3. The first synthesis of the comprehensive procedure is the preface, which regards the research object as a synthesis and gives a general description of one's own views. On the basis of synthesis, analysis is to discuss each part from different angles by chapter, and the results of each analysis are fed back to the synthesis at the next higher level. The following synthesis is in the conclusion part of the paper, summarizing the research of the whole paper and summarizing my own viewpoints.

Second, the writing method:

1, come straight to the point, don't beat around the bush, avoid giving a long story about the historical origin and the research process of establishing the topic, be concise, highlight the key points, and don't talk too much about the common sense content familiar to colleagues and textbooks. When it is really necessary to mention other people's research results and basic principles, just mark them in the form of quotations.

2. In the introduction, when putting forward the work and opinions of this paper, the meaning should be clear and the language should be concise. Reviewing history should be focused, the content should be closely related to the title of the article, and the background should be introduced around the title, which can be summarized in a few words. When prompting the method to be used, it is not required to write out the result of the method, nor to start a discussion.