Let's read a paper separately. It has arguments, arguments and core ideas. Structurally, it has a table of contents, an introduction, a core chapter, an ending, thanks and so on.

Now let's have a look. Your thesis is not a primary school composition, but an article with professional direction after nine years of compulsory education and four years of professional study in college. The teachers who read this paper are generally teachers with graduate education after having the experience of complaint learning. Even if you rack your brains, consult countless professional documents, and use the articles you have learned in your life, it may all be spit. . . Let alone make it up. . .

Now let's see what can't be mended.

The first is the argument. Arguments must come from reality. If there is reality, it will go to the unknown, and the unknown may be compiled. The actual fabrication didn't hit the gun.

The same is true for arguments. Take engineering papers as an example. Your argument can be based on quoted literature or theoretical calculations. Can you make up your calculation formula? I'm afraid the teacher didn't ask you with a knife But references, hehe.

But then again, the part that can be supplemented also has QAQ! For example, your introduction, thanks, etc. There is no need to be so rigorous. Of course, your core ideas may be wild, but don't be too divorced from reality.

Finally, I wish my classmates a smooth graduation. You can contact me if you need help ~

Hand-made, if there are similarities, we would be honored. Please attach the source if there is plagiarism.