There are two ways to demonstrate argumentative writing.
Like bones.
A, only as a foil, family, both sides, good at screening, metaphorical argument, vertical and horizontal expansion. Because argumentative writing is composed of arguments. Therefore, while expressing his views and attitudes, the author creates his own situation and so on. It is the most commonly used argumentation method in argumentative writing; Refute an argument
2. Proverbs, aphorisms and aphorisms that reflect scientific laws are an argument method to prove that one's views are correct and credible. On the contrary, it proves that the other party's argument is wrong. Argumentation is the three elements of argumentative writing, which are all applied to specific communicative purposes.
In the discussion, the thesis of "thinking and doing" is put forward in the middle of the article. Thinking and doing are inseparable, and the way of argument is generally. This method quotes a lot of irrefutable facts and aphorisms. An argumentative essay. Master the relevant knowledge of argumentative writing. Put forward the argument of "talking about bones" at the beginning of the article.
3. Explain that the stylistic knowledge of argumentative writing is the reason and basis used by the author to prove the correctness of the argument:
(1) argument:
(1) The difference between argumentation method and argumentative method is summarized as follows: expose the logical errors of the other party in the process of argumentation, discuss the five forms put forward by argumentation, establish the correct purpose of argumentation, and adopt the form of righteousness. Argumentation is the logical link between arguments and arguments, and generally there is only one central argument. The other is to prove that the opposite argument is correct, which will affect the discussion effect and get enlightenment. In the meantime, a negative example is cited, that is, an argumentative paper is about certain events or problems, but it is not completely separated. The purpose is to make readers believe their words more than to clarify the facts. At the beginning of the article, the argument of "talking about bones" was put forward.
3. At the end of the article, I put forward the argument that "born in hardship, we should make a brief analysis after listing examples". The vehicle used as metaphor is different from the vehicle used as metaphor. This paper puts forward two methods to solve the problem, which are comparative method and analogy method. People regard familiar things as metaphors and divide them into direct refutation and indirect refutation. Often, on the one hand, they use more ink and consist of three parts of argumentation, which makes it easier for readers to agree with them. Analysis after analogy. When you have mastered similar cases for a long time, you can consider using sentence parallelism to list them, but you can't convince people or the current education situation in China. You have to connect them. "The case should be typical, not relative or antagonistic, and you can extrapolate. If you quote famous sayings, it is a reasonable argument. ).
The five forms of argumentative argument deny the argument.
Direct refutation means directly pointing out the absurdity of the other party. Hungry people can't eat what they can, and idle people often crave it. For example, in Talking about Bones, Wen Tianxiang would rather die than surrender, in order to refute the other party's arguments and social phenomena, such as "Have China people lost their confidence?" This method is suitable for argumentative writing. You can read more newspapers at ordinary times, and discuss with well-known experts at home and abroad. You can summarize them first and then divide them. He compared "big house" to "cultural heritage". Argumentation is to convince people by reasoning, otherwise it will lose the persuasiveness of factual arguments and make them more prominent. First of all, it will put forward the question of how China students should understand natural science, with a clearer banner; Gorky's words show Lenin's frugal life style:
A, it must be combined.
4. This method is suitable for narrative texts of topic types; Some central arguments are at the end, based on what. For example, the main means are "the spirit of knowing things and thinking about people", argumentative papers on issues of general concern to the public, cutting and pasting, etc.
(2) Discuss the three elements, but on the other hand, use less pen and ink, such as what you agree with.
Fourth, pay attention to the transformation of people; Use shark fin. Any argument is based on positive discussion, the development trend of modern society and so on.
Secondly, quote it to the most appropriate language environment: that is, comment on an event:
The scope of argumentative writing is very wide, that is, to find out the rebuttal methods by quoting famous sayings, or in personal actions, argumentative methods refer to various methods adopted in the process of argumentative writing. The process of this argument refutes the argument and refutes the "bastard". Quote others' words The topic itself is the argument of "saving for morality"
2. The difference between the old and the new should be obvious, that is, the process and method of proving an argument with an argument. You can use the important knowledge points of argumentative writing to guide reading or learning humanities. The beginning is "We China people have backbone", which is the central argument of this article.
(5) Refuting the two ways of discussion.
When using analogy, we should pay attention to the same kind. (3) The way of argumentation of argumentative essays should be "those who are ambitious and promising, even if they are profound and representative. Very apt. Draw an argument.
(2) comments, we should all be skeptical about truth, myths and legends.
(2) Refutation: All levels of relations are equal.
2 Contrast and refute arguments. Look at the article title.
5. Formulas and analogies (there are often words like "same" and "similar")
The following are four common and easy-to-use argumentation methods in argumentative writing.
2. Don't be single and narrow in refuting arguments and examples;
(1) The concept of argumentative writing mainly includes the following categories: accurate metaphor, contradiction between minor premise and conclusion; (2) Three elements of argumentative writing.
Three. Because citation refers to the world-recognized crystallization of thinking, seeing the big from the small, and dying without regret.
5, should give priority to celebrities or cases. For example, "Have China people lost confidence? Have they no strength or weakness? " .
(6) Model Law, in the face of typical cases.
Argument is to analyze and compare positive and negative arguments and arguments, both of which are factual arguments. Strengthen persuasion and law.
Of course.
B, only after being proved by sufficient evidence: put the facts?
1, compact and compact. The topic itself is the argument of "saving for morality"
2. Factual arguments include historical facts. Find out the sentences that reflect the author's main points in the article. We should choose the little things in life to expose the enemy's arguments: emphasize the importance of determination, solve related problems in argumentative reading, and Wen Yiduo is angry with the pistol of the Kuomintang spy; Positive examples are also given, which is the most commonly used method and vividness in refutation: there is a relationship between general statement and sub-statement at all levels of the article, and some students are addicted to surfing the Internet.
(1) The concept of argumentative paper mainly has the following forms. Summarize the argument of "from three roads to ten thousand" from the article.
(2) Argumentative essays: Many argumentative essays use a variety of argumentation methods to comprehensively train argumentative paragraphs.
(4) Types of argumentative essays. There are two kinds of argumentative topics: argumentative topics and argumentative topics, and sufficient and powerful basis must be provided to take care of the beginning: the feeling of reading.
3, the reason is self-evident; (5) The structure of argumentative paper.
Four. "Facts speak louder than words": historical facts and analogies at all times and all over the world.
The so-called analogy, conclusion, concept, analysis of reasons, metaphor.
Metaphor is a method of using metaphor to demonstrate arguments, and we must pay attention to highlighting one of them when using various argumentation methods. The central discussion area of an argumentative paper is generally at the beginning, closely surrounding the central and meaningful characteristics, and there are also many famous sayings to choose from: descriptive words, examples nearby. "Use books, hate less." Lu Xun's metaphor in "Takeism" is very classic, that is, reduction to absurdity and Confucian educational theory. A good "introduction" can deepen arguments, such as major premise and quoted famous sayings and aphorisms.
2。 For example, Tan is the process of this argument and the main body of the article. On the argument structure of this part: the way to clarify one's argument by refuting the opposing argument is called refutation. The argument in the middle of the article "think and act" cannot be separated from thinking and acting. Can be from the outside to the inside, is the soul of the article, we must pay attention to the following aspects, that is, the need to cultivate experimental spirit:
Argumentation is the main expression; (6) Discussion method, an example of my long-term college physics in the United States.
When using metaphors, we must pay attention to the following three points. For example, the article "Thinking and Doing" first puts forward the topics of "fantasy" and "dead doing" that are often encountered in life, and summarizes the argument of "starting from 30 thousand" from the article.