What is the reason for the paradigm? (the basis for choosing the experimental task)
Instead of taking it for granted, I want to see if this will produce anything.
This kind of "why" academic thinking is very necessary, and it is not only scientific research, but also the problem-solving strategy based on cause exploration in life!
Some details often reflect your attitude. Therefore, the phrase "details determine success or failure" makes sense. Having said that, I thought of the balance between details and overall grasp, which is also a point that needs attention. It takes time and effort to cram too many details, and it is bound to be shoddy if you don't pay attention to details)
And in our research, we should pay more attention to details! For example, the positive and negative correlation of the graph needs to be consistent with the positive and negative correlation you reported. And statistical steps. Generally, do variance analysis first, and then compare them with each other. You need to pay attention to the standardization of the use of these statistical methods.
Adding "details" to "reasons" is one of the biggest gains after listening to my defense this time!
Difficult, but also full of fun to explore, a long way to go, continue to refuel!