The second stage, from liberation to the Cultural Revolution. Typology began to occupy a dominant position in archaeological excavation research, especially Peking University and Xia Nai, which were dominated by the Soviet Union, were transferred to the Archaeological Institute, and their subsequent academic development direction was less influential than that of Su and others. This was the first development climax of China archaeology, and it began to form its own characteristics, such as using rich underground data and broad geographical relations to construct prehistoric archaeological cultural sequences.
The third stage is since the reform and opening up. In 1980s, western archaeological theories were gradually introduced, which triggered constant debate and reflection. Typology still occupies and will occupy the mainstream of research for a long time, but other research methods have also been paid attention to. Like some sub-disciplines, multidisciplinary research is becoming more and more important.
For details, please refer to Chen Xingcan's Prehistoric Archaeological History of China and Shen's Archaeological History of China. And Yan wenru's. Luan Shifeng's archaeological theory and method can also be practiced.