First, graduate students must have four books.

As the saying goes, a good memory is not as good as a bad writing, so we must first develop the good habit of taking notes! As a graduate student, the following books are essential.

1, experimental record book (including experimental reference book), this is of course essential, so I won't say much;

2, idea notebook, every time you read the literature, first write down what is useful to you, and the resulting ideas can not be let go. This is the capital for research. A good memory is not as good as a bad pen, and it will be more thoughtful to flip through it later;

3, professional concepts and theoretical progress record book, everyone can't know all the concepts in their field, especially beginners. At this time, the role of a small book is great;

4, lecture notebook, this notebook may be a bit miscellaneous, record what you hear, but also record the instant inspiration and what you don't understand, not to be underestimated!

These four books are essential for you, but as our non-English major graduate students, there is another book that we should have, and that is the Record Book of Good English Sentences.

Second, the main points of thesis writing

1, the topic should be small and the excavation should be deep; Don't have a big topic, but have a thin content.

2. Read a good book before writing, read a lot of materials and pay attention to academic accumulation. In this process, you should also pay attention to using the network, especially some professional databases.

3、? New topics, new methods and new materials? Three new principles (taught by the boss)

4、? New questions and new exercises? And then what? Make a fuss about trifles.

In short, write some opinions.

Third, how to write an experimental research paper (Tang Dynasty Book)

Consciousness of publication: expression of basic research results: whether it is urgent to publish (the relationship between innovation and rigor); The difference between published papers and dissertations (reflecting scientific facts rather than the author's level)

Paper format: original work, express, briefing and abstract. Different from textbooks and handouts, it is also different from work summary.

Preparation before writing: review and prepare relevant documents; Re-examine the purpose of the experiment (academic idea); The experimental data are complete and reviewed again.

1. Introduction:

Ask questions; The present situation and background of the research; Previous work foundation; The purpose of this work; Ideas (decent assumptions); Object; Methods; Result. Are you online? On the model, observe? Indicators to explore? (purpose)

2.M & ampM

(1) Writing and significance of materials; Ethics.

(2) Procedures and indicators. Operating procedures: orderly and operable; Methods: Multi-index ranking method; Introduce the brief introduction of references; Improvement; What is detailed or simple? ⑶ Statistical processing

3. Results

(1) index classification description, to avoid running accounts. Do not analyze or explain, only reflect the train of thought.

(2) Words, diagrams and tables are relatively independent, but repetition is avoided.

⑶ Avoid statistical errors: compare, balance and repeat. Measurement-counting, absolute value-relative value, specific indicators? Conversion of comprehensive indicators. Blind judgment and non-blind judgment. Direct probability method and chi-square test of technical data; Multiple sets of data and two sets of data; Grade correlation and straight line correlation; Multivariate and univariate analysis; Paired data and independent sample data; Non-normal distribution data; Improper number of cases; Parallel tube, mixed sample; Highlight the difference (absolute value,? Value, change%; United Airlines? 、? Ratio, grouping, etc. ). Statistical conclusions and professional conclusions.

Step 4 discuss

(1) background material: putting forward development issues; Some basic knowledge about this research (don't digress too far)

⑵ Analysis of the experimental results: The significance of each index (compared with the literature value), what does the result show?

⑶ Further analysis of the result mechanism: combined with the literature.

(4) the significance, conclusion or summary of this work, and further new problems.

Other considerations:

There are too many references (different from dissertations), which cover up the contribution of this work.

② The analysis is illogical and the conclusion is improper.

③ The discussion is too superficial and the literature knowledge is unfamiliar.

(4) Writing a work summary lacks academic height.

⑤ Use abbreviations correctly, especially group abbreviations.

5. References: Why should I cite references?

(1) The document on which the argument is based: a new and authoritative document, with no express or abstract.