Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Guizhou Daily commented on Academician Maotai's article about the "rage" of the masses. what do you think?
Guizhou Daily commented on Academician Maotai's article about the "rage" of the masses. what do you think?
Now explain what is grumpy?

Violent Chinese words. It refers to the spirit of violence, and it can also refer to something that is very cruel and absolutely likes to do everything. Go to extreme psychology or ethos first.

I wonder if Guizhou Daily means this? If that's what you mean. People have the right to supervise, don't you know? Netizens believe that as long as it is fair, open and just. There is nothing wrong with choosing an academician.

These people may be amateurs. The layman can see that. Mystery. What do professionals see? A bottle of wine. It is ridiculously expensive. China has a population of over one billion. How many people have drunk Maotai? Does Maotai serve the people? It should be said that he serves the rich.

Is it a bit disdainful for Guizhou Daily to say so? The people are strong.

If it's a godmother, other spices. Can they also be academicians? This common people have eaten and have a say. I haven't drunk Moutai, so I have no right to speak. People think you should lower the price of Maotai so that people can afford it.

People's food, clothing, housing and transportation, these grounded things also need scientists to inject painstaking efforts, so we can't study liquor production. Scientific and technological workers are excluded from the steps of co-electing academicians.

Criticism and teaching of Guizhou daily's bullying. But I misunderstood most netizens. What netizens mean is that you have done these things. It has promoted the development of science and technology in China. You can choose.

In fact, most netizens want our technology. Our army is very strong, and many academicians will not get stuck. It's not bad to choose a few academicians of alcohol, tobacco and gold. However, we are still subject to people in many fields and often get stuck in the neck. We can't drink, smoke and perm behind closed doors.

The popularization of science and technology has prompted people to form the habit of thinking rationally and handling affairs rationally.

It's a pity that an important local media can't do professional publicity in the field of science and technology!

The core problem of Academician Maotai is that the media and the Association for Science and Technology in Guizhou have the commercial purpose of building brands. Why not publicize the engineering and technical direction represented by Maotai?

Guizhou should focus on promoting modern brewing industry-biological enzyme engineering. The important thing is to say it three times-biological enzyme engineering in brewing industry-biological enzyme engineering in brewing industry-biological enzyme engineering in brewing industry!

It must not be the folk media that dare to say that people are "angry". Folk media lack such tyrants!

More importantly, people are worried that Academician Maotai's engineering scholarship is really not at the forefront of the wine-making field!

So, is it impossible to select academicians by studying winemaking? It should be said that this matter cannot be simply denied. If we use materials and technologies that have never been used before to make wine, for example, we can use oil as raw material to make wine. This technology has great engineering significance and the selection of academicians is acceptable. However, just a technician of an established enterprise, even if you really have some contributions, what is the geometry of this contribution? Because of this, even ordinary people will raise various questions. As someone teased, if the brewer evaluates academicians today, can the head of Beijing Roast Duck still choose academicians tomorrow? Can the founder of Laoganma beef sauce? Of course, there are Lanzhou beef Lamian Noodles, Xi 'an mutton bread in soup, Tianjin Goubuli steamed stuffed bun, Wang Zhihe stinky tofu and Liubiju kimchi. Can you choose an academician for all these industries?

What is the anger of the masses? Don't label the masses as grumpy as soon as you express different views. Have Guizhou people figured out how old Moutai is? Moutai has a history of nearly a thousand years in China, which means that the formula of this wine has been passed down to today for nearly a thousand years.

Dare to ask, this 49-year-old female engineer who is about to be promoted as an academician was born more than 19 15 years ago when Maotai won the world gold medal at the Panama World Expo 100? The answer is no, when the technology of Moutai 1996 was protected as a state secret, the engineer was still a young man who didn't graduate from college and didn't necessarily know where Maotai Town was. ...

Seriously, the development of Maotai today has little to do with this engineer. Maotai is a prescription, but she didn't invent it. Although she holds the position of chief engineer of Maotai Group, she, like hundreds of winemakers in Maotai Group, is doing the inheritance work in different positions, and at best, she is just a high-ranking inheritor within the Group. Then you must ask, why and why does Guizhou have to promote the engineers of Maotai Group to academicians? Furthermore, as everyone in China knows, only those who have made systematic and creative achievements and great contributions in the field of science and technology are eligible to be promoted to academician. Is it?

I don't deny that brewing also has a certain technical content, but it must be a more traditional technology, otherwise Moutai can't submit an application, right?

What the masses question is that if the traditional fields such as wine making and wine tasting can produce academicians, then there will be a sea of people who are qualified to be academicians in China. What are the criteria for academicians? What is the seriousness of judging academicians?

I feel that academicians should be the special words of scientists who have made great contributions to the country's great powers or high-tech technologies. If it is occupied by the bartenders of Maotai, I think it is a great violation and degradation of the honor of academicians.

It is understandable that Guizhou Daily speaks out to the pillar industries in its own province.