How to write a good argumentative essay.

First of all, you need to extract your own arguments from the given materials. It is very important to establish your own argument for the following writing. A clear argument can ensure that we can focus on it closely when writing and achieve the effect of "hitting the nail on the head". There are generally three possible positions in argumentative writing: (1) completely affirmative; (2) completely negative; (3) reservation.

For example, such a material: "In a team, the advantages of cooperation outweigh the disadvantages, and the disadvantages of competition are of great benefit." You can take a completely positive position or choose a completely negative position; If you think that the advantages of cooperation and competition among team members outweigh the disadvantages, you can also choose to keep your position, partially agree with and partially oppose the material.

With a clear point of view, the materials quoted in the first paragraph should be concise and clear, give readers a clear feeling, and then demonstrate the point of view. You can imagine that you are arguing with the other party, and he holds the opposite view. In this case, we should try our best to convince each other. Imagine that the other party may attack with several sub-arguments. We can put forward our own sub-arguments and expand the general argument step by step. Still the previous example. If you think that the advantages of cooperation outweigh the disadvantages, it can be expanded as follows: First, cooperation allows team members to provide different ideas and methods to solve problems, so as to choose the best one and bring innovation. Second, cooperation can give spiritual support to team members, and so on. Every argument must be supported by strong theoretical arguments and facts. If we can properly solicit quotations and make every argument solid and credible, we can achieve the effect of "step by step".

When you are completely positive or completely negative, don't forget that nothing is absolute. Don't "kill with a stick" If it was completely positive before, we might as well think rationally. It may still have some problems, and it may be better if it can be improved. If you were completely opposed before, you might as well think about it with tolerance. It may still have some merits. At this point, your article is comprehensive and convincing.

A person with a sense of social responsibility will not just analyze problems logically, but the most important thing is to solve them. If you have a positive attitude, you'd better write out what you can do to achieve the best results. If you hold a negative attitude, you'd better think about whether there is a better way to solve the problem in order to achieve the goal of "abandoning the old and establishing the new". If you think that the advantages of cooperation outweigh the disadvantages, you need to suggest how to strengthen cooperation. First of all, we should cultivate people's sense of honesty, because cooperation is based on mutual trust. Second, we should strengthen emotional communication with each other, because cooperation requires mutual tacit understanding and cooperation. In this way, we not only analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of cooperation, but also put forward ways to strengthen cooperation, which not only analyzed the rationality and rationality of our argument, but also strongly demonstrated its feasibility.

In this way, a profound and heavy argumentative paper is completed. I believe readers can see the problem clearly through your article and see your profound thoughts.