Jiangsu Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security issued the latest notice, demanding to further eliminate the bad tendency of "only papers, only education, only qualifications and only awards" in the evaluation of professional titles, establish and improve the first evaluation mechanism for professional and technical personnel, and adhere to the criteria of ability, performance and contribution to identify talents.
The notice proposes to establish and improve the first evaluation mechanism for professional and technical personnel's professional titles and morality.
Professional and technical personnel who have won various awards at all levels in terms of professional ethics are given priority when applying for professional titles under the same conditions, and occupy a certain weight when quantifying standards. Implement a "one-vote veto system" for academic fraud and professional ethics anomie. Establish and improve the evaluation exit mechanism based on moral integrity. Once verified, those who have lost their moral integrity and serious dishonesty will be disqualified from applying for professional titles, and will be recorded in the integrity file of professional and technical personnel's professional title application and evaluation in the province.
The notice requires that evaluation indicators such as papers and monographs be set and used reasonably. The evaluation criteria of each title series (major) gradually changed from "required paper" to "multiple choice" of results, and established a "menu-style" evaluation index system. The series of practical titles such as health, engineering, art, primary and secondary school teachers do not take papers as the main evaluation index for title evaluation.
Break the unreasonable educational threshold. Part-time education and full-time education, vocational college graduates and ordinary school graduates at the same level enjoy the same treatment in the evaluation of professional titles. After graduating from intermediate class, advanced class and preparatory technician (technician) class in technical colleges, you can declare the corresponding series of titles according to secondary school, junior college and undergraduate degree respectively. The study experience abroad shall not be used as a restrictive condition for participating in the evaluation of professional titles.
Attach importance to the identification and evaluation of key core technology research talents. Members of the 1 project team who have undertaken and completed major basic research projects, major scientific and technological achievements transformation projects and key core technology research projects at or above the provincial level and made outstanding contributions can be recommended to be directly promoted to a higher level.
Establish an enterprise talent evaluation mechanism that meets the needs of industrial development and economic structure. For outstanding entrepreneurs, management talents and high-level innovative and entrepreneurial talents who have made outstanding achievements, they can relax the reporting conditions such as academic qualifications, qualifications and years, and directly apply for the evaluation and determination of senior professional titles to promote enterprises to enhance their independent innovation capabilities.
Innovate the evaluation and incentive mechanism of grassroots talents. For those who have worked in the grassroots front line and hard and remote areas for a long time, increase the evaluation weight of dedication, actual work performance and working years, focus on improving the career development space of grassroots talents, and encourage talents to take root in the grassroots front line and make contributions.
Fully implement the evaluation of representative results. Combined with professional characteristics, achievements such as standard setting, technology promotion, technical solutions, innovation breakthroughs, high-quality patents, achievements transformation, theoretical articles, think tank achievements, literary and artistic works, teaching plans and cases can all be taken as representative achievements to participate in the title evaluation. Pay attention to the quality, contribution and influence of representative achievements, and highlight the evaluation of their quality, original value, actual contribution to social development and supporting personnel training.
Explore the inclusion of new occupations such as digital economy, technical brokerage and aged care in the scope of professional title evaluation. The establishment of professional title evaluation directory, the implementation of list management.