Argumentative writing
First, according to the general thinking mode of discussing problems, it should be composed of three parts: asking questions, analyzing problems and solving problems (or introduction, theory and conclusion). "Asking questions" means to clearly put forward the central argument at the beginning of an argumentative paper, "analyzing questions" means to analyze and demonstrate the central argument in the middle of the article, and "solving problems" means to draw a comprehensive conclusion or forward-looking hope at the end of the article. Everyone knows this, and I won't repeat it here.
The second is to analyze the problem, that is, the part of this theory, which should be discussed in layers according to a certain dimension. The so-called "dimension" is the direction of discussion. There are four dimensions: what, why, how and what. Under normal circumstances, a middle school student's argumentative essay can be expanded by choosing one or two of these four dimensions. But no matter which direction you look at it, there must be some connection between its arguments. Generally speaking, there are three types: parallel type, progressive type and contrast type.
The so-called juxtaposition is to list several arguments from the same direction around the center and demonstrate them one by one. If you only write around one dimension, then the relationship between several sub-arguments is mostly parallel. For example: argumentative essay 1 (please click to browse this argumentative essay).
Compared with the parallel structure, the progressive structure is the same except for the different meaning connection between arguments, so I won't talk about it any more.
The so-called contrast is to start from the positive and negative aspects of the topic, make positive and negative comparative arguments, and draw a conclusion. Its advantages are simple structure, sufficient demonstration and convenient use. The simplest contrast is that after putting forward the viewpoint, one section demonstrates the viewpoint from the positive side, the other section demonstrates the viewpoint from the negative side, and finally draws a conclusion. Another comparative structure is to discuss or put forward arguments from the front, and then discuss them from the opposite side through turning points or assumptions. For example: model essay 2 (please click to browse model essay)
argumentative writing
Argumentative essays are lyrical, vivid and philosophical, giving readers a rational image and emotion, thus providing a broad space for thinking and association. It often contains profound philosophy, which combines emotion, philosophy and image in one furnace. When appreciating argumentative essays, we should pay attention to understanding reason from emotion, influencing emotion in reason, and carefully understanding the artistic characteristics of the blending of reason and reason. Argumentative writing belongs to prose and literary works, not argumentative writing. But it is different from general prose, such as narrative prose, landscape prose and lyric prose. Its ideological connotation is rationality, and it is a unique reflection on social and life problems. Its purpose is to inspire and educate people, and prose is just its writing style. In this sense, the teaching of argumentative writing should first make students understand, that is, grasp the reasons or symbolic meanings expressed in the article. However, argumentative writing is not a good argumentative writing. It is not expressed in the logical form of concept, judgment and reasoning, nor is it organized in the structural form of asking questions, analyzing problems and solving problems. Its writing is more flexible and free. To paraphrase a ready-made phrase, it is "scattered in form and scattered in spirit." There are two other points that deserve our special attention (the most important point in my opinion), that is, 1 argumentative essays are often expressed in literary language when reasoning, sometimes euphemistically and implicitly. This kind of prose is often accompanied by strong emotional color and distinctive personality color when reasoning.
Argumentative writing
First, according to the general thinking mode of discussing problems, it should be composed of three parts: asking questions, analyzing problems and solving problems (or introduction, theory and conclusion). "Asking questions" means to clearly put forward the central argument at the beginning of an argumentative paper, "analyzing questions" means to analyze and demonstrate the central argument in the middle of the article, and "solving problems" means to draw a comprehensive conclusion or forward-looking hope at the end of the article. Everyone knows this, and I won't repeat it here.
The second is to analyze the problem, that is, the part of this theory, which should be discussed in layers according to a certain dimension. The so-called "dimension" is the direction of discussion. There are four dimensions: what, why, how and what. Under normal circumstances, a middle school student's argumentative essay can be expanded by choosing one or two of these four dimensions. But no matter which direction you look at it, there must be some connection between its arguments. Generally speaking, there are three types: parallel type, progressive type and contrast type.
The so-called juxtaposition is to list several arguments from the same direction around the center and demonstrate them one by one. If you only write around one dimension, then the relationship between several sub-arguments is mostly parallel. For example: argumentative essay 1 (please click to browse this argumentative essay).
Compared with the parallel structure, the progressive structure is the same except for the different meaning connection between arguments, so I won't talk about it any more.
The so-called contrast is to start from the positive and negative aspects of the topic, make positive and negative comparative arguments, and draw a conclusion. Its advantages are simple structure, sufficient demonstration and convenient use. The simplest contrast is that after putting forward the viewpoint, one section demonstrates the viewpoint from the positive side, the other section demonstrates the viewpoint from the negative side, and finally draws a conclusion. Another comparative structure is to discuss or put forward arguments from the front, and then discuss them from the opposite side through turning points or assumptions. For example: model essay 2 (please click to browse model essay)
I've been looking for it for a long time. Can you give me some points?