First, there is no need to argue with netizens.
Teacher Jiang Kun is a famous crosstalk performer, with many representative works, such as Dream in the Tiger's Mouth and Taking Pictures in this Way. He not only talks about cross talk, but also writes his own jokes. He once said that when he was on a business trip, when he encountered something funny, he quickly wrote it down, accumulated a lot of material and used it in paragraphs. Many people just see that Mr. Jiang Kun has not published many works, and say that he is at the end of his rope in Jiang Lang.
1985, Teacher Jiang Kun won the title of "Top Ten Comedians in China". Many young people nowadays were not born in that era, were they? He has made such high achievements, not to mention that he is not only an actor, but also a cadre of the Chinese Quyi Artists Association. He has a lot of things to do, so he doesn't have much time to create.
Even if he doesn't have time, he will still take time to create works and present his new work, New Tiger's Mouth reverie, on the stage of the Spring Festival Evening. Some netizens said that this work is not funny. However, Jiang Kun said that crosstalk works are more instructive. At this point, Mr. Ma's cross talk also has such a role, so that after listening, everyone can go home and think about the content.
Teacher Jiang Kun's realm is higher than that of ordinary netizens. He felt it unnecessary to respond to the criticism of netizens. As we often say, ignoring them is the greatest contempt. For Jiang Kun, this is not a matter of ignoring, but there is really no need to respond to the comments of netizens.
For Mr Jiang Kun, the criticism from netizens won't hurt him at all, because he doesn't need to argue with netizens. Some netizens are not insiders, and insiders just look at the doorway. The layman just sees the excitement, so he can ignore what the onlookers say. As Degang Guo said, a layman who graduated from elementary school, when evaluating the thesis written by a doctor, if the doctor rolls his eyes, even if the doctor loses. Mr Jiang Kun was right not to respond.
Second, Jiang Kun's measurement is great.
Jiang Kun, a teacher who has been practicing cross talk for so many years, naturally knows the depth of it, and naturally ignores the evaluation of laymen. What's more, his identity is the director of the Quyi Institute of the Chinese Academy of Art, and his words and deeds naturally attract attention. If he responds, he may be taken out of context by some people with ulterior motives.
Some people say that he and Degang Guo are at odds, but they are both prestigious people in the field of phonology, and there is no argument. Mr. Yu Qian and Mr. Degang Guo have cooperated for many years. They are partners and have a tacit understanding. Deyun Society performed a cross talk drama, and Jiang Kun watched and held a forum. Some of the participants are Yu Qian, which shows that the relationship between the two is not as bad as everyone said.
Even Degang Guo and Jiang Kun can communicate with him, not to mention others. Many people talk through hearsay, which is not enough for WeChat. As a cadre, Jiang Kun naturally knows the weight of his speech, so he won't speak rashly and won't bother netizens, because he doesn't need it, which would be beneath him.
Xu Zhisheng once said that he was a "talk show Lu Han". Some people say that he can neither raise himself nor depress Lu Han. If Jiang Kun responds, the effect may be the same. Therefore, it is right for Teacher Jiang Kun not to respond to netizens. Many people think that in today's society, we should do it when we should. In fact, the world of adults is: low-key life, low-key work.
Teacher Jiang Kun is also such a person. She used to take a child home, educate him and make him a better self. He didn't publicize such a thing. He doesn't think it is necessary to respond to the cyber violence of netizens, because in his measurement, he can bear it.
Degang Guo once said that when you go out to do things, you should be prepared to be scolded, because your money contains being scolded. Mr. Jiang Kun doesn't know whether he will agree with this view, but Mr. Jiang Kun pays more attention to the inheritance of cross talk than to the communication on the Internet.
Jiang Kun's anti-vulgarity is to purify cross talk, and Degang Guo agrees. He believes that cross talk should appeal to both refined and popular tastes. If it's just elegance, no one will listen. If it is tacky, it will not be on the table. Teacher Jiang Kun thinks that cross talk is not so much irony as education.
Satire may not promote development, but education can. This is why our country has always advocated rejuvenating the country through science and education. Education can make people progress, improve their cultural quality, and let more people feel the author's intentions in laughter. If we can laugh and cry, so much the better.
Teacher Jiang Kun didn't respond to the comments of netizens, because Teacher Jiang Kun read the minds of some netizens. He felt that these people should not be allowed to succeed, let alone that he would be idle to respond to them.
Third, Mr Jiang Kun didn't fight back because he saw it clearly.
Teacher Jiang Kun's energy is not on the Internet, but in reality. Actually, he is very busy. As a cadre, he has a lot to do. Not only go to the grassroots to investigate the development of cross talk, but also go to some TV stations to do programs. I started a program myself. Too busy to reply to netizens.
Even if I have time to surf the internet occasionally, I will see some comments from netizens, but I don't want to respond. Some people think that he has a response, and with his light, he can become famous. Someone once said, scold Degang Guo! Some people may want to do the same, and launch an internet storm on Mr. Jiang Kun, hoping to get his response. However, Mr Jiang Kun let them down.
He didn't respond to netizens because he didn't want these people to take the opportunity to become famous, and he didn't want some netizens to think that what they said was true. He once responded that some people just passed it on. This sentence means what they say, not the fact. If it's not true, why respond? what do you think?