Ancient scholars must have teachers. Teachers, so evangelists are also confused by the industry. This is the opening words of the article. After this sentence, China's View on Ancient Literature said, "This is where a great program lies." It seems that this is the highlight of this article. However, at the end of the article, the Wu brothers said, "The whole article is just a sentence from my teacher's way", as if it were not this sentence again. From the following situation, it seems that we should take the general view as the correct view. Han Changli basically did not make any analysis on why teachers' duties should be taught by profession and how teachers are taught by profession. The point of the article is to learn from the teacher bravely. Shi Shuo is not a refutation, but the meaning of refutation is quite obvious. There are two places where I feel the strongest when I read Korean. First, when writing a theme that gives people a strange feeling, the author is very excited about it. If it is unfair, he complains, resents or laughs, which is particularly touching. From this point of view, Shi Shuo is not the most touching text of Han Yu. Second, Han Yu is particularly good at writing rebuttals. No matter Jin Xuejie or the poor, it is hard to argue. Zhang Zhongcheng's biography and postscript refute those who "compare themselves with rebellion", and the taboo discussion refutes the tedious taboos of irony and vulgarity. Needless to say, the Buddha-making words such as the Buddha's bone table are extremely powerful and magnificent. And even if it doesn't appear in the form of refutation, the author likes to set up opposing targets. This article comes from the secretary writing network. So when you read Korean, you can clearly feel that Han Yu's words are not empty talk, and every sentence is aimed at the key of an opponent. -"Shi Shuo" is this. If you want to write a wonderful paper, you can't practice by yourself. You have to find an opponent to pinch yourself to write the taste. In Han Yu's own words, this is called "no blockage, no flow." I am a teacher, and I don't know that years were born in me. "I learn from the Tao" is the theme of the article. That's true of course, and it's hard to disagree today. However, as I said before, Han Yu wrote this article with the intention of confronting others. Therefore, this article only talks about the meaning of "learning Tao", that is, as long as learning Tao is good for you, you can learn from anyone. As for another meaning that can be derived from this sentence: you should believe in Tao itself, but for teachers, there is no need to be overly superstitious and blindly obedient. The article only vaguely mentions it. Of course, this knowledge is actually "ancient" in China, that is, in the Analects of Confucius: "Be a teacher wholeheartedly".