"Niche since to a good father. Looking for a bosom friend in the mountains and flowing water ",I met Boya in the early stage and collaborated with him to compose a song" Mountain Flowing Water ",which left a harmonious beauty for future generations;

On the court, players in all positions cooperate closely, and the collision between wisdom and speed gives people the beauty of strength; In the field of science, people on all fronts are "flying dreams" of Yuan Huaxia for thousands of years. Mutual assistance and cooperation give people spiritual beauty.

Cooperation produces beauty, no matter when and where. ...

Are you fairies who came to earth in nine days? Or the flying goddess in Dunhuang legend? Or the rebirth of avalokitesvara?

In a dazzling golden light, you 265,438+0 are like fairies, spreading your delicate hands and classical Sanskrit, spreading love and hope to the world at the Athens Paralympic Games, and spreading the Chinese civilization tradition to every corner of the world. ...

The foreign teacher's eyes are wet, which she didn't expect. Unexpectedly, in China, the experiment was successful: a simple game, a bottle with a narrow neck and seven colored balls, the bottle mouth was very small, only one ball was allowed to pass at a time, and the rope was held in the hands of seven children. Suppose the bottle is a burning building and the colored ball is a person in the house. Only by running away at the specified time can you survive. When the whistle blows. I saw seven students pull out one by one, and it only took three seconds. In other countries, children are scrambling to draw colored balls, and all the colored balls are stuck in the bottle mouth. ...

There is a saying in the Book of the Later Han Dynasty: "* * * go hand in hand and help each other in the same boat." Today, with the development of modern material civilization, we should strengthen cooperation with each other, because cooperation produces beauty!

[analysis]

The topic is cooperation. What is the meaning of cooperation? The author avoided answering! But it is skillfully associated with "beauty": the beauty of spirit, the beauty of life, the beauty of art and the beauty of creation.

Cooperation can produce beauty, which is a unique vision. The author starts with his own stories and interprets them in a narrative way, which makes the discussion of the article unique. In the meantime, the author's associative power connects irrelevant things and things together, so all facts and ideas take off, and the association is endless. The author does not pay attention to argumentation and reasoning, but only points out a problem at the end of the article.

Because, in the author's view, argument is redundant. There is no need to argue with a straight face. The beautiful story he told has already touched readers, and readers can naturally understand the meaning of "cooperation".

The exam obviously requires writing an argumentative essay, but what did Chen Zhong write? Just piled up a few examples, and at the end of the article, I ordered a sentence, "Cooperation produces beauty." This is an unqualified composition, but Mr. Wang, the teacher, thinks that this article has the aesthetic style of "unsystematic", "interesting" and "infinite similarity", which makes people gallop. At this time, any argument is "redundant".

Obviously, this middle school Chinese teacher is really encouraging students to express themselves freely according to the suggestion of "curriculum standard", without worrying about how to write argumentative papers, and even thinks that "he has created a way of speaking or style that can best express himself". Therefore, I think the description of "expression" in Curriculum Standard is a typical reflection of the disorder of writing teaching in the real language world, and this disorder will be aggravated if we follow the ideas expounded in Curriculum Standard.

Originally, according to the writing rules of essays, to discuss cooperation as a topic, we must clarify the essential significance of cooperation to people's real life and how to cooperate on the basis of its connotation and theme. The so-called "cooperation" refers to the cooperation between two or more actors Qi Xin and * * * camp, which is called "cooperation".

From the analysis of this rational definition, we can see that its significance lies in concentrating the wisdom and strength of many parties. It can be predicted that this method may achieve greater benefits in terms of time, results, quality and value. That's why we advocate cooperation. Because Chen Zhong deviated from the basic rules of argumentative writing, he didn't understand the essential meaning of "cooperation". He told several examples one-sidedly, and thought that he had creatively discovered a "truth"-"cooperation produces beauty".

In fact, "cooperation" not only produces "beauty" but also "evil". Good people cooperate to do good, and bad people cooperate to do bad things. Objectively speaking, the meaning of "cooperation" lies in the efficiency and success of doing things, not in what is produced. The ancients said that "one word is easy to handle", which is the essential significance of cooperation.

Therefore, Chen Zhong's self-righteous "way of speaking or style" is actually a manifestation of not knowing the rules of argumentative writing. Kant said: "Experience tells us what the present is, but it doesn't tell us that it can't be anything else at all. Therefore, the experience proves that the foundation cannot cause any unquestionable proof. "

(Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Li, Renmin University of China Press, p. 55 1 page) The actual cases of those people can only show that the "cooperative" working way of those people doing that kind of thing at that time, on that occasion, has produced beauty, but can't prove the "cooperation" of others at other times, on other occasions and when doing other things. The assertion that "cooperation produces beauty, no matter when and where" is wrong.

Therefore, Chen Zhong's statement that "cooperation produces beauty" is inaccurate or one-sided. Therefore, his article is unqualified, and it is impossible for readers to accurately and profoundly "comprehend" the essential meaning of "cooperation". In this way, it is obviously wrong for Mr. Wang to say that there is no need to "make sense with a straight face" and "just tell beautiful stories".

While writing this review article, I called the editorial department of a chinese magazine in Shanghai to ask readers' reaction to Wang Wenzhang. An editor told me that there are two opinions about the manuscript: opponents and supporters. In this regard, I am not happy for people's active academic thinking.

However, from these so-called "encouraging free expression" and making students "creative", we can clearly see how the theory of "freedom" advocated by "curriculum standards" has influenced, and the writing teaching in middle schools has reached the point of distinguishing right from wrong. Tell the students the rules first, and then talk about "innovation". "Enter from the rules and don't stick to the rules", but we can't help but talk about "freedom" and "innovation".