As a student, I am used to reciting in boring textbooks and occasionally reciting historical records outside textbooks. The story of "self-recommendation" appeared in Historical Records Biography of Yu Qing: Handan was surrounded by the State of Qin, and Zhao sent for help, so he went to Chu and made an appointment with 20 people who had the courage to equip themselves with martial arts. Said: "if Wen can win, that would be great." If Wen can't win, he will be killed under the penalty room, and he will definitely pay back the money. Just take it from the diners' door. "Nineteen people, the rest are not desirable, no more than twenty people. A man praised at the door and said, "I heard that you will join hands with Chu. There are about 20 people at the door of the restaurant, that's all." There is one person missing today. I hope you can go with the staff. "
Sima's old man made it clear that these twenty people are brave men, and they are both civil and military, and nature is no exception. Besides, when they arrived in Chu, they joined hands with Chu and said they were interested. As far as sunrise is concerned, Japan and China can't decide. Nineteen people called Mao Sui and said, "Sir." Mao sui climbed the ladder according to the sword, with a tongue like a spring and a tongue like a lotus. He fought side by side with the king of Chu, and finally failed to fulfill his mission, which truly proved that Mao Sui had both military, cultural and brave abilities. However, Mr. Liu Chenglong said nothing about Mao Sui's "courage" and "martial arts" in "Shame of Mao Sui", only that Mao Sui is "a man who works by mouth, where is his opponent with a gun?" A weak scholar. Although Mao Sui can't become a martial arts expert, it is obviously untrue to say that Mao Sui is a weak scholar.
"Mao Sui is ashamed" said: "After Mao Sui died. He died less than a year after recommending himself. The cause of death was indeed related to his self-recommendation. It turned out that in 256 BC, Yan took advantage of the fact that the war in Zhao was still unsuccessful and sent a general to attack Zhao. " This is also untrue. According to Records of the Historian Biography of Lian Po and Lin Xiangru, Handan was besieged for five years, and Yan used the plan of chestnut belly to say that "Zhaozhuang is in Changping, lonely but not strong" and sent troops to attack Zhao. According to Historical Records Yan Zhaogong Family, in the first year of filial piety (Yan), the Qin Dynasty drove away all the people who surrounded Handan. Three years ago, Wang Xili died ... Four years ago in Wang Xi, Qin Zhao died. The life of the prince is about Zhao Huan, and 500 gold is the wine of Wang Zhao. He also reported to the prince: "All the strong men in Wang Zhao are dead and live in peace, but they are lonely and not strong, so they can be cut." According to historical records, Zhao: (Zhao called the king) asked Chu for help for eight years. Also, Chu came to save, and Wei Gongzi Wuji also came to save ... (Zhao Haoqi) In the fifteenth year, Wei Prime Minister Lian Po was appointed as the monarch of Xinping. The Prince of Yan ordered the Prime Minister to invite Li's belly, and returned 500 gold for Zhao's wine. He said to the Prince of Yan, "Many strong men are lonely but not strong, so they can be beheaded." From this point of view, "Yan was defeated by the battle of Zhao and sent a general to attack Zhao" should be between five and seven years after he volunteered, not less than one year after he volunteered.
"Shame" also said: "Yan took advantage of Zhao's endless battle to win, and sent general Li Fu to attack Zhao. Who was sent to fight the enemy? The prince of Zhao remembered the courage to recommend himself. He wants to be promoted to commander-in-chief and unite the army against Yan ... In order to show his desire for talents, Zhao Wang insisted on letting Mao Sui command the battle. " This is even more unreal. During this period, although the strength of Zhao was declining, its power as a big country was still strong, and it was supported by Lian Po, Lecheng and Li Mu. Compared with Yan, Zhao Jiangyan is weak. Li abdomen attacked Zhao, and Zhao led 80,000 troops from Lian Po to meet them, and defeated the Yan army in Zhu, attacked Li abdomen and chased it for 500 miles. Visible, the prince of Zhao put aside Lian Po, Lecheng, Li Mu and a bunch of military star, promote a guest handsome, it is nonsense. As for Wang Zhao's desire for talents to show himself, this is Mr. Liu Chenglong's deliberate prejudice against Wang Zhao.
Mr Liu Chenglong said that Mao Sui was a weak scholar, which paved the way for Mao Sui to commit suicide in the forest.
Mr. Liu Chenglong said that Mao Sui died less than a year after he recommended himself. This is because Mr. Liu Chenglong wants to highlight the rapid death of Mao Sui through the comparison of time.
Mr. Liu Chenglong said that the Prince of Zhao promoted Mao Sui to be a handsome man and unified the army against Yan. This is to give Mao Sui a chance to perform on the battlefield and die.
But in any case, what Mr. Liu Chenglong wants to express is the theme of the article, "Either a handsome man covers all the ugliness, or an ugly man covers all the handsome men". For this theme, Mr. Liu Chenglong tried his best to rewrite history, distort facts and make things out of nothing. This kind of article really makes readers feel very fresh. On the surface, it seems that it can express "a handsome man covers a hundred ugliness, and an ugly man covers a hundred handsome men". As we all know, in the process of the author's discussion, it is even worse than "one handsome man covers all the ugliness, and one ugly man covers all the handsome men". This is like a corrupt official trying another corrupt official. During the trial, the first corrupt official takes bribes in front of another corrupt official.
History is not allowed to be tampered with and beautified. The true history recorded by the predecessors will definitely give history a true face. As long as you find out with your heart, a so-called fresh article like Mr. Liu Chenglong is not worth mentioning in front of us who love to get to the bottom of it.
"History is precious and the fact is more expensive. If it is new, both can be thrown away. " This is the standard for most writers to write now.
We call for the truth of history.