As the name implies, comment-comment-opinion.
In other words, we should first point out the advantages and disadvantages of the other party, then give the final result or score according to the advantages and disadvantages, and finally give some guidance and suggestions to the other party as an expert.
Question 2: The initial opinion on how to write a good article should be 5 points. The first trial mainly depends on the structure of the article and whether there are any mistakes in the text.
Question 3: How to write the audit opinion of national grants? The student studies hard, is helpful in life, respects teachers and unites classmates at school, but his family conditions are not ideal. Now he is applying for a national grant, hoping to get approval.
Question 4: How to write the audit opinion? Write 20 points for several advantages and disadvantages.
Question 5: How to fill in the examination opinions of the preliminary examination department in the Application Form for Qualification of Construction Enterprises? This question is so interesting. The examination opinions of the preliminary examination department shall be sealed by the Construction Bureau of the Municipal Construction Committee or the Provincial Construction Department and other relevant departments. How do managers of enterprises fill in what?
Question 6: How to write the audit opinion of the financial aid school? The column of "Audit Opinions of Scholarship Schools" is filled in by the staff of the school authorities such as the principal's office, and cannot be filled in by students, parents or class teachers themselves, which involves the application process. It should be collected by the monitor or other class committees and submitted to the class teacher, who then submitted it to the hospital office. The staff of the hospital office will review whether the applicant meets the application qualification according to the specific situation of the applicant. If the qualification conditions are met, the staff usually only need to fill in "the situation is true after examination and meets the application conditions, and it is approved".
Question 7: How to write the review opinion of the project commencement application form? Meet the starting conditions and agree to start work! Almost!
Question 8: How to write my previous doctoral thesis? The reviewer wrote it according to the abstract in my paper, and it's OK to refine it. There should be some innovations written by yourself in the self-criticism book. You can refer to it Leonshane (station contact TA) first makes a brief summary of this paper, pointing out its main clues: research purpose, method, significance, innovation and so on. And then point out one or two biggest problems. If the problem is really fatal, it is recommended to modify it for a long time. Your tutor will check it for you after you finish it. If he doesn't study, I suggest you apply for a new tutor. . . Shuoyeb (station contact TA) 1. General evaluation project: the academic value and application value of the innovation achievements of the paper. The paper reflects the author's basic theory and professional level. 2. Comprehensive evaluation of all reviewers' academic comments on the paper (significance of topic selection, innovative achievements of the paper, academic value and application value, rationality and reliability of experimental results and calculated data, etc.). ) ... 3. Problems, deficiencies, opinions or suggestions in the paper. 2.....LBH535 (sTAtion contact ta) audit opinions should be combined point by point. The surface is the general situation, and the point at least reflects whether the reviewer has read the content carefully. At present, many papers are in the first instance, especially in social sciences. The comments are so general that people feel that they have not read them carefully. Qiu Qu _2002 12 (contact TA in the station) suggested to reply, and then simply write some comments. K 1000 1 (in-sTAtion contact ta) There is also an eight-part essay: The thesis shows that * * * has mastered a solid and extensive basic theory and systematic and in-depth professional knowledge in the research field, and has (strong) independent ability to engage in scientific research, and the thesis (innovation) has reached the academic level of doctoral thesis. It is suggested to organize doctoral thesis defense. If there is a prompt in the nono2009 (Station Contact TA) review form, you can write a review opinion according to several items required by the prompt. Songjm 12 (conTAct ta in the station) read the requirements of the first two pages of the evaluation book and write a comment. Is the research question clear, the research goal clear, the method appropriate and the result obvious? Is the workload full and the content substantial? Wait, the best way is to find an old doctoral thesis and copy it down. Stereotyped writing ~ ~
Question 9: How to write the opinions on the paper (sample) for the opinions passed by the review?
IPv6 is the core technology of the next generation Internet, and network protocol testing is a powerful tool to ensure the smooth operation of the network. Zheng Hongxia's master thesis studies the conformance testing of IPv6 protocol, focusing on the design method of test cases, and its topic selection has important practical value.
On the basis of summarizing and analyzing the previous work, combined with the scientific research background, this paper selects the key work and puts forward a new design method of IPv6 protocol conformance test cases. By applying this method, the generation of test sequence of pre-test step and post-test step can be optimized, and a simple test case structure composed of pre-test step and test body can be obtained.
The evaluation index and calculation method of test cases are put forward, and the advantages of the new test case design method are analyzed quantitatively. Using the test case design method proposed by the author, the test sets of ICMPv6 protocol, IPv6 PMTU protocol, addressing protocol, IPSec protocol and conversion mechanism protocol are designed. In the test practice, it is verified that the new test case design method can simplify the test sequence, shorten the test execution time and improve the test efficiency.
The work of this paper shows that the author has mastered the basic theory and professional knowledge in related fields, has strong scientific research ability, and has achieved some innovative and practical research results in the design of network protocol conformance test cases.
The paper is clear in organization, clear in description, concise and fluent, and well combined with theory and practice. Reach the academic level of master's degree thesis and agree to defend the thesis.
Overall evaluation of the paper: excellent 2 votes, good 2 votes, 1 vote, average, 5 votes in favor of defense.
Write in this format in combination with your paper.