At the beginning of the manuscript, the author's review process and review status are mainly concerned with the review process. Only the information with identity and status hidden in the manuscript was mastered. Now, the review process of SCI papers is introduced in detail.

Participate in the review:

(1) The editor-in-chief (EIC) has the final decision on the manuscript.

(2)ADM- (can) Administrator assists the editor-in-chief in his work.

(3) Deputy Editor-in-Chief (AE) comprehensively evaluates the basic articles of reviewers' opinions, and all editors write the final decision according to AE's opinions.

(4) Reviewer-Review the article and submit the review comments to AE.

Articlesubmitted (that is, paper submission):

1, waiting for the chief editor to be arranged by the administrative team 3-4.

2. Wait for the reviewer to wait for the designated editor to select the reviewer and wait for the reviewer to reply. Whether to agree with the reviewer depends on the speed of reviewing the manuscript within one week.

3. Waiting for the reviewer's score to wait for the review opinion. Give the evaluation opinions within three weeks. It is enough to write to the editor-in-chief asking for an extension of the review period. The short term depends on whether the comments are free, and the long term depends on whether the articles are kept for about three weeks.

4. Wait for AE distribution and wait for AE distribution editorial department to select/contact 1-3 or so.

5. Waiting for AERE AErecommendation Waiting for AE to recommend some magazines to require AE to settle the account within three weeks, basically two months.

6. Waiting for the decision of EIC-waiting for the decision of the editor-in-chief 3-4

EIC finally identified several situations:

1- accepted

2- Accepted after minor modification (without our re-examination, it needs to be submitted for review again)

3- Review after major revision. (If you want to submit for approval again, you must go through the approval process 3-6)

4- Reject submission (the current status of the paper can be revised and resubmitted, which needs to go through the review process 1-6)

5- Reject (I don't want to transfer to its journal as soon as possible)

The author from the submission of papers to the review status. In fact, you don't have to be familiar with the audit process to eliminate all states. Now you want to see the results and submit them to the author instead.

Reference: Tips for Polishing Charlesworth's Papers