Some lawyers said, "The dismissal during the contract period was unilaterally terminated by the enterprise. Usually, many behaviors we see violate the company's rules and regulations. Units bind employees' behavior according to their own "laws". As long as you seriously violate it, (the company) can be dissolved. This thing has zero cost. " In other words, since the company has formulated such regulations and employees have violated them, it is legal for the company to dismiss employees.
Haier's untimely but tough and vague response obviously failed to make people breathe a sigh of relief, but intensified the controversy. According to Haier's official statement, the company's system stipulates that employees can arrange their own meal time between11:30-13: 00, and emphasizes that these four employees sleep in public reception places during working hours. The problem is that the dismissed employees sleep during11:30-13: 00. According to the company system, it should be rest time, so how can sleeping become working time?
From the perspective of employees, lunch break can bring mental relaxation to employees, thus enhancing their happiness and improving their work efficiency. From the company's point of view, employees should have a rest during lunch break, which will help employees concentrate on their work in the afternoon.