"Speculation" is interpreted as "thinking discrimination" in the dictionary, which is embodied in the arguments and arguments of argumentative papers. At present, middle school composition teaching and learning are convinced that there is no difference in the ideas of the article, which leads to a considerable number of students thinking that the shallowness and depth of truth are irrelevant and unwilling to carry out speculative training in Chinese reading and writing. Take the composition topic of the 2008 college entrance examination as an example. This year's essay topic is: Please write an article with the topic "Don't say' no' easily". Many students only write under what circumstances not to say "no" easily, instead of digging out why not to say "no" easily, which leads to the article stopping at enumerating phenomena and not speculating. Argumentative writing must be good at thinking, otherwise it is difficult to enter the high-tech school.

The harmfulness of weak speculation

Poor hype, not only the refined views are not deep, but also inaccurate. The so-called uncertainty means that you can't reflect the essence of things when discussing, and you can't be sure what the materials provided explain. The problems explained by materials, propositions and topics themselves are objective and do not depend on your subjective will. Only when your "subjective" and "objective" are consistent can you guarantee the word "accurate". For example, there is an idiom called "a rope saws wood, and a drop of water wears away the stone". How can a rope cut wood and water penetrate a stone? If we say: persistence, perseverance, right? Yes, but it's only half right. Here, in addition to persistence, we must also be single-minded; Concentrate on one place. In this way, it is possible to "break" and "wear". If you only catch one side, it means that you don't understand the whole and essence of things. Of course, it is difficult to grasp the "quasi" when discussing. If you want to grasp it accurately, you must be speculative. We can see the essence through phenomena, and we can dialectically analyze problems with comprehensive view, split view and development view.

Argumentation needs to be speculative, and argumentation also needs to be carried out in speculation.