Yao Ming led his teammates in the men's basketball team to donate bone marrow, and Alec Su used his birthday to set up a "charity foundation". At present, more and more celebrities are keen on public welfare undertakings, and they say they will repay the society through donations. However, many media criticized celebrities for doing good deeds with high profile, and they were accused of being "not modest" and "deliberately improving their social status". In my opinion, the real meaning of charity lies not in the motivation and way of donation, but in the social significance it brings-helping people in need and making the source of social charity endless. In this way, charity has achieved the effect of helping the world, so why blame charity for its high profile or not?

High-profile charity is a higher realm of "reaching the world and helping the world". The indifference of "doing good without leaving a name" is commendable, but it is limited to "being alone" after all. Indifferent only for their own moral cultivation. Why is it as high-profile as doing good deeds "saving the world"? Doing good is a sign of compassion, and high-profile doing good is a sign of helping the world in action! We have a saying that "getting rich first drives getting rich later". Obviously, these rich people and stars are outstanding in the ranks of "getting rich first". High-profile charity is a strong embodiment of the sense of social responsibility and mission of "helping the world at the same time".

There is a saying in the Confucian classic "University", which means that "the benevolent aims at the development of himself and society, and makes and uses money as a means to achieve the immortal realm of making contributions and establishing morality." The beauty of high-profile charity lies not only in their selfless donations to help those in need, but also in celebrities using their influence to call on more people to join the charity team and arouse more people's inner kindness. If Yao Ming silently donates bone marrow and doesn't tell the world, it can only save one person's life; However, his high-profile charity has enabled more and more people to join the charity ranks of donating bone marrow and saved more patients. If the world's richest men, Bill Gates and Buffett, just silently donate their assets, even if they are rich, they can only solve the urgent need and save one party. However, Bill Gates and Buffett jointly launched a donation to spread the "charity wind" across five continents and called on the rich around the world to give back to society. There is an old saying: "Give a man a fish, but don't give him a fish." High-profile charity broke through the shackles of a fish, and this "kind-hearted" method was passed down from generation to generation, achieving the effect of helping the world-forming a social atmosphere of charity. Why not?

However, high-profile charity does not mean luxury charity. It is advisable for Chen cursor to donate money and mobilize his family to do good deeds with practical actions. It is understandable that the old lady wants to make public her story of collecting money. However, it is really not enough to promote charity through beautiful women, luxury cars, luxury banquets and luxury songs and dances. Rousseau said that "the inevitable consequence of luxury-the disintegration of weathering-in turn caused the corruption of interests." Extravagance and waste can not be consistent with the theme of charity, but also lead to the waste of property, which will also attract media reports on the disparity between the rich and the poor, widen the distance between giving and receiving, deviate from the original intention of charity, and lead to social doubts about charity. Celebrities are celebrities because they are praised and trusted by the public. The transformation from "name" to "name" is essentially the promotion from personal resources to public resources. Wealth comes from thrift. If charitable donors, especially celebrities, can't make proper use of their own brand values, it will not only waste public resources, but also give the society a wrong direction and become the initiator of unhealthy trends. Zhang Ziyi's "fraudulent donation" has hit the bottom line of people's trust in celebrities, and the "Red Cross Guo Meimei Incident" has even reduced the amount of donations from the Red Cross to a low point. Both of them make "celebrity charity" and "brand charity" the focus of controversy and have far-reaching influence. In view of this, frugal and grand charity is the high-profile charity we advocate.

Nevertheless, high-profile charity is still an important way for celebrities to thank and repay the society, and it is also an effective means to awaken sympathy and help the world at present. What the society should do is to correctly use the celebrity effect and correctly guide thrift and high-profile charity. Only in this way can the spring breeze of "high-profile charity and saving the world" spread all over Jiang Nanan in a "harmonious society" and bring a bright spring of "giving charity".

Teacher's comment: This composition is the easiest to list only phenomena and talk about charity. However, this article is a rare in-depth review article. The full text closely revolves around "high-profile charity", combining with various examples of celebrities doing charity at present, revealing the essence, talking about the significance, clarifying the understanding, interlocking and explaining it in simple terms. Comment on charity fashion from a historical perspective, with accurate examples and incisive analysis. Score 50.