1. Academic value: This is the primary criterion for evaluating the quality of papers. The academic value is mainly reflected in the innovative, theoretical and empirical aspects of the paper. Innovation means that the paper puts forward new ideas, new theories, new research methods or new research results; Theoretical means that the paper has conducted in-depth research and discussion on the theory in a certain field, put forward new theoretical viewpoints or made important supplements and developments to the existing theories; Positivism refers to an in-depth analysis and explanation of a problem through a large number of empirical studies.
2. Writing quality: This is an important criterion for evaluating the quality of papers. The quality of writing is mainly reflected in the clear structure, strict logic, accurate language and standard quotation of the paper. Clear structure means that the chapters of the paper are divided reasonably, the arguments are clear and the arguments are sufficient; Logical rigor means that the discussion process of the paper is rigorous, the reasoning is correct and the argument is powerful; Language accuracy means that the language expression of the paper is clear, the words are accurate and the sentences are fluent; Reference specification refers to the accuracy of reference data and the specification of reference format.
3. Research methods: This is an important criterion for evaluating the quality of papers. The research methods are mainly embodied in scientific research design, reasonable data collection and analysis methods, reliable research results and so on. Research design science refers to clear research objectives, reasonable research assumptions and scientific research methods; Reasonable data collection and analysis methods mean that the data source of the paper is reliable, the data collection method is scientific and the data analysis method is correct; Reliable research results mean that the research results of this paper are repeatable and can stand the test of peers.
4. Social impact: This is an important criterion for evaluating the quality of papers. The social impact is mainly reflected in the social impact of the research results of the thesis, including the impact on policy making, academic research and the public.
Generally speaking, it is a comprehensive and systematic process to evaluate the quality of the papers of the Journal of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, which needs comprehensive evaluation from many aspects.