Q: Will the falsification of undergraduate thesis data be discovered by teachers?
A: No, the teacher will let you pass if you write something important. I also graduated from undergraduate course. At that time, my tutor asked me to do my own design. I did it all by myself, and the quality of the work is definitely not good. I didn't show it to the teacher until a week before the defense. The teacher said that the general appearance is ok, and it is ok after passing.
A: Generally not, but you'd better do the data yourself.
There is no need to falsify data to prove your proposition. If the real data can't prove your proposition, write down the conclusion and the next guess generously. Science is exploratory in nature, and no one can guarantee that his ideas must be right.
Some tutors for master students will tell students that natural science is not humanities, and things like politics and law should first set propositions and then collect evidence to support them, as long as they are logical and consistent, no matter right or wrong; Natural science puts forward hypotheses and then verifies them with real data. Right and wrong are right and wrong, and wrong is rewarded, at least it shows that this road is impassable. Forging data means that your thinking mode is not linked to natural science.
Experimental data fraud:
In order to prevent the falsification of experimental data, one way is to "decompose all experimental work into parts" and carry out "assembly line" operations to ensure that each experimental link is not wrong or falsified; Another way is to arrange different people to operate each experimental stage to ensure that the experimental results can be repeated.
The laboratory should establish strict original record management regulations, and any experimental data should be recorded on the spot, and it is not allowed to make up afterwards. And the recorded data cannot be changed at will. If it is a clerical error, it should be signed by the recorder and the collaborator to prevent the source data from being tampered with.
The first author is usually the main operator of the experiment, and may be the only drafter of the first draft of the paper. In order to prevent the data of the first draft from being tampered with, all participants in the experiment should participate in the writing of the first draft, not the first author. At the same time,% of the original experimental records are open for the author to consult and ask questions at any time.
The first author can't list people he doesn't know as * * * co-authors, nor can he be listed as a correspondent with the consent of the "boss". If the "boss" is a veritable correspondent, he should be serious and responsible when reviewing the manuscript, carefully proofread and revise it, and read the original records when necessary to prevent the first author from deliberately practicing fraud.