Analysis of the meaning of the question: this is a multi-angle essay with allegorical nature. From the materials, we can see that there is a beautiful misunderstanding between frogs and crabs. To some extent, the frog's guidance is no problem, and the crab's understanding is taken for granted. So how to grasp the center of this material? The key is to master the material "I didn't lie to you! I told you to go straight ahead, but you crawled sideways. Of course, you can't reach the river. " This key sentence, in addition, because the title requires us to "conceive a composition from one side and one angle", we can think separately from frogs or crabs when conceiving it. If we think from the frog's point of view, we can also see that the reason why the frog didn't do good deeds is because it only gave advice to others from its own point of view, instead of thinking about it from the crab's point of view, forgetting that it was born to crawl sideways, and as a result, it did bad things with good intentions. From this perspective, we can draw a similar view that "helping others (giving advice to others) should be considered from others' perspective". If some students have a comprehensive grasp of the materials and put forward the view that "misunderstanding stems from wrong communication" and can justify themselves, it is also a topic.