Civil servants are the rulers of the country. They exercise the special powers entrusted to them by the state, and at the same time use these powers to manage the people and coordinate affairs, so as to make the country prosperous and the people live and work in peace. However, after all, people will have selfish desires, and the emphasis on power has led some civil servants to resist many temptations and produce corruption. In this way, the special power given to civil servants by the people of the country will certainly cause controversy. No one wants to let abusive officials take care of themselves. Of course, no one wants to see the annual civil service examination reach a cruel level just because people are chasing power. Improper use of civil servants' power leads to the restriction of civil servants' power. It can be said that this kind of behavior almost aroused people's hatred of power. Excessive restrictions on the power of civil servants will greatly eliminate their role in social activities, which is tantamount to disintegrating the country's management ability and is an extremely dangerous move. Therefore, the attitude towards the power of civil servants must be both restrictive and protective. Only when it is restricted, the people will rest assured that civil servants will exercise their functions and powers; Only by ensuring this can civil servants serve the people dutifully. After weighing the pros and cons, we must limit the power of civil servants with appropriate efforts and coordinate the unity of opposites between restriction and guarantee, so as to build a healthy relationship between the government and the people and make the society develop harmoniously.

The restriction of civil servants' power is very important. Since ancient times, China people's consciousness of being an official has been extremely strong, especially the supreme thought of "learning to be excellent and being an official" advocated by Confucianism, which has not cooled down for 2,500 years. The foundation that Kong Old Master Q wholeheartedly laid for autocratic rule has now become a stumbling block to our progress. It is hard to predict that the elite of any other country in the world is as keen on being an official as the elite of China. The root of fanaticism is power, which was invisibly amplified under the authoritarian system in the past. Now our society stresses the rule of law, and a sound legal system can well restrict the power of officials, and reducing the power of officials can alleviate the national civil servant fever. This is the first point I want to explain about restricting the power of civil servants, that is, we can clearly define the proper role of power and avoid the increase of civil servants' corruption caused by people blindly joining the national civil servants. Secondly, it is the will of the people to actively restrict the power of civil servants. Power has always been a sensitive topic, and people who are keen on power are often despised by the public. The reason is that people do not trust managers from the bottom of their hearts. Politics is meaningless, worthless and incompetent to the public, and officials often become the breakthrough point for the public to vent their unfair fate. Take the initiative to control the power of officials and let officials face the people humbly to cater to the people's mentality of facing managers. Finally, restricting the power of civil servants is a necessary factor to maintain social stability and harmony. The most fundamental difference between the rule of law and the rule of virtue lies in whether the standard of managing a social country is the objective fact of materialism or the subjective idea of idealism. Our choice of the rule of law is the result of the progress of the times, and it is the most reliable to restrain people's behavior with objective laws. What is hidden here is a thorough analysis of the nature of human selfish desires. When we use laws to restrain people's public life, we must also think of using specific laws to restrain civil servants, and this restraint must be stricter and more authoritative. This is the simplest logic, because civil servants should set an example and be strict with themselves. Strengthening the restriction on the power of civil servants is nothing more than formulating more draft amendments to supervise their work. Civil servants also have selfish desires. It is foolish to expect them to resist temptation through extraordinary cultivation. In the end, it will often corrupt the social atmosphere and make the country increasingly weak.

It is important to protect the rights of civil servants. First of all, the authority of civil servants as managers in the exercise of power is indispensable. If the state does not guarantee the authority of the implementation of civil servants' power, then the governance of the state will become a big problem. For the restriction of civil servants' power, we mostly consider it from the standpoint of the people, while for the protection of civil servants' power, we must consider it from the standpoint of the state. The stability of the country is closely related to the performance of managers, and the low ability of managers in management will directly lead to the turmoil of the country. Especially for a developing country like China, with the social transformation, social problems become more prominent, and managers should maintain their authority. Secondly, civil servants themselves have the right to fight for legitimate rights. Because of the special nature of civil servants' work, the protection of their rights is actually the protection of their work. We should conform to the wishes of the people, but civil servants should also be able to put forward their own demands equally, and the state should give them satisfaction within its power. If a country turns a blind eye to the demands of its image spokesperson, there will be no future. Only by meeting the reasonable requirements of civil servants themselves can civil servants work hard and ultimately the country and people will benefit. Finally, only by safeguarding the rights of civil servants can the country operate normally and develop actively. Whether it is the ancient imperial examination system or today's civil service examination system, we should affirm the talents selected by these mechanisms while seeing fierce competition. These excellent people may sometimes be too self-righteous and self-respecting, but they all have abilities and knowledge that ordinary people don't have. In the process of realizing their ambitions, they are actually benefiting the people and solving their worries for the country. And the tool they need most to realize their ambitions is power. Through the use of power, they can coordinate the relationship between good people and people, and between people and the country. Only when these relations are truly harmonious will our society continue to progress. Therefore, the state's protection of civil servants' rights is an important cornerstone for this outstanding civil servant team to display their talents and pursue their dreams. The greater the ability, the greater the responsibility, and the carefully selected talents of the country cannot be bound to do nothing. Excessive restrictions on the power of civil servants will inevitably lead to the pursuit of mediocrity and stability, so what is the driving force of social development?

Coordinate the relationship between restriction and guarantee. To sum up, we need to find a good balance point to properly restrict the power of civil servants, and the designation of these constraints should follow the characteristics of adapting to local conditions and keeping pace with the times. For civil servants in different positions and regions, restrictions should be imposed according to the actual situation. With the development of the times, more challenges may be posed. Faced with these uncertain factors, we should also actively adjust our strategies to adapt to the new era.