Until now, this is what I have seen. On the basis of my views on pop music, the only authoritative professional musician who has a better view on pop music is the correct article "Pop Music-Don't talk about things professionally" signed by Jin Zhaojun. In addition to disagreeing with the division of music into elegant music (art music-such as art songs) and pop music, I also strongly oppose the so-called division between musicians and musicians, because it is a foolish practice to despise and suppress pop music-works of art in essence. It is an indisputable fact that pop music has provided extremely rich nutrients and extensive benefits for human cultural life. On the other hand, it is an iron fact that pop music lovers have given rich spiritual and material rewards to the producers of pop music. Therefore, I always believe that both classical music and pop music, as long as they are good music, are spiritual wealth worthy of inheritance and development. Finally, professional musicians began to have a correct understanding of pop music and a rational return. People began to correctly evaluate the status of pop music in people's minds, and made various attempts to increase the "theoretical music component" in pop music. Recently, China's "British Group" was a successful example. Just as natural science is divided into theoretical science and applied science, music is divided into theoretical music and applied music-commercial music, or traditional music and pop music, or classical music and pop music. The artistic treasures of human music, marked by pure music such as Bach and Beethoven's orchestral symphonies (not specifically the composer's absolute music), are the "treasures of the town hall" that lay the theoretical foundation of modern music, unify the language of human music and accumulate the essence of human music. It is theoretical music, equivalent to the theoretical essence of Newtonian mechanics and Einstein's theory of relativity in natural science, and also a compulsory course for music education in concert halls. The contribution of pop music to human beings lies in the evolution of these theories into a commercial music commodity that is loved by the general public and can well analyze and show its spiritual life, greatly enriching people's amateur cultural life. Without applied science, theoretical natural science is just a pile of waste paper. Without the decomposition and precipitation of theoretical music by pop music, theoretical music can only be a flower in the court of a few narcissists and a grass at home. Because it is very simple, it is not necessary and impossible for ordinary people to study music too deeply for their lives, and it is impossible to feel the great charm of music for human emotional and spiritual life. What needs to be clear is that people's most extensive demand for music is as an auxiliary material in life, not as a source of life. If all mankind becomes professional musicians, then everyone will have to drink the northwest wind. In order to survive and prolong life, human beings must create and engage in various occupations and become experts in these occupations, so they have no time and energy to become musicians at the same time and become people who can enjoy the so-called "elegant music", although theoretical music is very attractive to people's employment. If you want to know my most concentrated, clear and incisive analysis and demonstration of this point of view, you can look at my Sina blog posts-post-style tofu block articles "The vitality of pop music comes from its reflection on young people's voices" and "Don't say that it is popular and vulgar-it is also a super girl". /view/878cda21dd36a32d73758136.html and if you go here, it seems to be the pop music paper you mentioned, thank you!