Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Skills and methods of argumentative reading comprehension
Skills and methods of argumentative reading comprehension
The skills and methods of argumentative reading comprehension are as follows:

First, the three elements of argumentative writing: argument, argument and argumentation.

Second, demonstration methods: reasoning, example, comparison, quotation and metaphor.

Third, the way of argument: argument and rebuttal. Argumentative essays can be divided into two categories: argumentative essays and argumentative essays. )

Four. 1. The functions of analysis and demonstration methods are as follows:

(1) Demonstration with examples: By citing concrete examples, the demonstration will be more concrete and convincing.

Format: Use argumentation method to demonstrate (summarize examples) (if there is a sub-argument, write the sub-argument it proves, otherwise write the central argument), thus making the argument more specific and convincing.

(2) Reasoning argument: prove the argument through reasoning, making the argument more general and profound.

Format: The argument method of reason argument is adopted to demonstrate the viewpoint, thus making the argument more general and profound.

3. Metaphorical argument: use metaphor to prove and make the argument vivid and easy to understand.

Format: By using the method of metaphorical argumentation, the viewpoints are compared and demonstrated, thus making the abstract and profound truth vivid and easy to understand.

④ Comparative argument: The role of comparative argument is outstanding.

Format: Use the method of comparative demonstration to compare and highlight the viewpoints.

⑤. Citation: Its function should be specifically analyzed. For example, quoting famous sayings, aphorisms and authoritative data can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; Citing celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read.

Format: Use the method of citing arguments to make the argument more convincing by citing proven viewpoints. (or more interesting, attracting readers to read)

2. Type and function of analysis and argumentation: Argumentation can be divided into two types: truth argumentation and fact argumentation. So the standard answer format is as follows: this is an argument, which plays the role of proof (argument, if there is a sub-argument, write the sub-argument it proves, otherwise write the central argument. )

3. The ways in which the article puts forward the central argument are as follows: ① The title of the article points out the central argument; ② Put forward the central argument at the beginning of the article; ③ The article ends with a central argument; (4) Put forward the central argument with a connecting sentence in the middle of the article. ⑤ The article does not directly put forward the central argument, but always revolves around it.

4. Analyze the argumentation ideas of the article.

The structure of a general argumentative essay: asking questions (introduction)-analyzing questions (thesis)-solving problems (conclusion). In fact, analyzing the argumentation idea of argumentative essays is to add some words such as "first", "then", "then" and "last" on the basis of paragraph level. When you do this topic, you should pay special attention to the opening and closing sentences.

The functions of the beginning are as follows: (1, putting forward the central argument; (2) lead to the topic; In the above two aspects, it is necessary to specifically answer the specific tests that put forward the central argument or lead to the topic, some through famous sayings, some through celebrity anecdotes, and some through anecdotes and jokes.

The function of the ending: (1, deepen the central argument and put forward the conclusion; (2) Repetition or reinforcement of the central argument; (3) Call or exhort people; (4) Supplementary argumentation. Its function is to make the argument more rigorous.