The west has no habit of recording history, no astronomy, and no necessary conditions for recording history. The biggest flaw in western history is that most of the academic works that appeared during the Renaissance 600 years ago were named as ancient sages, but none of them were unearthed. When the discovery of ancient Greece and Rome was announced 200 years ago, most of the cultural relics appeared on remote islands, and most of them were not suitable for building cities. Where there is a city, there is water. However, many discoveries of civilization are divorced from this common sense. Secondly, the sculptures and buildings found at present are very mature in architectural style, and they are basically mature works in the late Renaissance. So the question is, where did you copy it during the Renaissance? They have never seen the real thing.

1. Historical sites in the west are not weathered but destroyed, even in the Mediterranean coastal areas. Don't say that a dry climate is conducive to preservation, geographical knowledge and geological research and reliable historical records. According to the Bible, those areas were quite rich before 2000;

2. The history of European countries is not long, and there are obvious faults in smelting technology. So far, no historical relics of metallurgical development have been found, which can not explain the evolution process from stone tribe to iron city-state. The only thing that makes sense is that they migrated from areas where smelting technology is quite mature.

3. A large number of relics dating back thousands of years include exquisite sculptures and wall carvings, which are exquisite in shape and workmanship, full of Renaissance artistic style, as perfect as last week;

4. A large number of special characters and symbols can be interpreted when they are just unearthed, and it is seriously suspected that they were crossed by diggers;

You can find complete paper thousands of years ago in any cave, with clear handwriting and yellow paper. I have read several genealogies. Before liberation, the paper was rotten and black, and it felt that human beings had been regressing.

6. A cave, with a little search, can find out the organic products of different periods that span thousands of years. I really don't know how much people who live in this cave care about things that were tens of thousands of years ago and keep them so well.

7. In the period of western archaeological fever, a few amateur archaeologists can dig up a large piece of cultural relics and make a fortune through the excavated antiques. It is claimed that an ancient city was found in historical records, and the manuscripts drawn by several people are quite different;

8. Just treat western relics as scenic spots. It's been at least a hundred years. If you appreciate it, you won't lose it, but if you believe it, you will lose it.

Engaged in historical research for 30 years, from a professional point of view.

Starting from Egyptian civilization, the origin of western culture;

There were 3 1 dynasties in ancient Egypt, and the chronology was based on Manieto.

Manetto is just an Egyptian priest. His book is History of Egypt, but it has long been lost.

Then, in 70 BC, Christian timekeepers Eusebius and George recorded Egyptian history incompletely.

There is not even archaeological evidence. Even the Palermo stone tablet is incomplete. Even if it is complete, it only records the events of the first five generations.

Without the evidence of archaeological relics, it is still incomplete, and there are supplements from future generations. So is historical research still credible?

Have you read the history of ancient Rome written by Herodotus? The works of the father of western history, including myths and stories, are beautiful, much like Shan Hai Jing, but what about authenticity and credibility? History is not a story!

Historical research needs to be rigorous. Do you believe what you hear from listening and speaking?

It is not clear whether western history is false. However, in the field of China history, at least it is not rigorous because of the lack of archaeological proof.

In ancient Egypt, Greece and Rome, because there is no custom of burial, no paper and no first-hand historical materials, its credibility is debatable.

When it comes to archaeological discoveries, it goes without saying.

The terracotta warriors and horses were originally colored, but they were oxidized to gray immediately after being unearthed. Then who can tell me why some western unearthed cultural relics are not oxidized and have bright colors?

The subject is subjective. It should be asked: What historical materials can prove that ancient western history is true and credible?

Lack of first-hand historical materials is the biggest obstacle to the study of ancient western history.

I hope a professional person can provide it to make up for the gap in my knowledge.

Why do some people think that western history is false?

Probably because they have logical thinking and resolution.

The legendary Greek temple was actually built of reinforced concrete invented by modern times. (forgive all kinds of watermarks. For more details, please refer to cctv4.

Someone contemporary with Confucius, without paper, actually reached four or five million words.

A blind man wrote a horse epic on parchment, with nearly 30 thousand lines and millions of words.

Many western history books are found in the garbage. You heard me right. They are garbage dumps.

A stone tablet deciphered the Egyptian script. There are more than 4,000 words in Oracle Bone Inscriptions, China. More than 1000 words have been decoded, and more than 3,000 words cannot be decoded. We really should let westerners try.

Because they have too many historical problems, which can be used as evidence. For example, Athens, Greece, built by the sea, should have a history of at least 2000 years, but judging from the degree of sand erosion, it is only a few hundred years old.

I think that western history is false, which is somewhat arbitrary. Let's just say it's complicated, unlike China with Shi Kejian.

In the west, you sing and I appear, each leading the way for decades, and some are short-lived. Even though Greece has a long civilization, it is also a fault generation, unsystematic and inconsistent, far less than Chinese civilization. This gives people a feeling that there are many western wars. You defeated me and I conquered him. It's really an ordinary horse change.

Judging from China's standpoint, perspective and cognition, the west really has nothing to say, even historians are terrible, not to mention our generation has the ability to comment, but I don't agree to confuse the false with the true.

A little too much. They found too many books and works in a short time. If our history is short, we won't feel anything, but compared with our corresponding historical period, considering the level of productivity and writing methods at that time, especially considering that a huge amount of parchment and those cultural relics overlap with those of China at the same time, it is difficult to think of a reasonable explanation ... Civilization certainly existed, but it may not be as brilliant as his descendants said.

As long as it has existed, there should be traces left, which is * * * knowledge. And if you look at the history of western civilization, you will find that the chronology of many things is very vague, that is, they are all estimated by yourself. Why? Because they don't have a unified calendar. In fact, we can see from the international price of cultural relics that the cultural relics in China are basically priceless, and sometimes fake ones are very valuable. Look at the cultural relics of western civilization, and the prices of cultural relics in China are not in the same class. Why? Because they know how fake it is. So it's not that their history is pseudo-history, at least its authenticity is questionable.

According to the records in the history of China, the people of China have a tradition of measuring the earth since the Yellow Emperor. It was recorded in Huainanzi 2000 years ago that Yu stepped across the east and west and across the north and south. According to official records, Ban Chao sent Gan Ying to the western countries, and was blocked by the sea at sunset in the western pole. At that time, Persian Arabia, Rest Branch, was a country adjacent to China. The comfortable residence in the north could reach Rome by land, so he should not have to go by sea, which was seriously inconsistent with the story of ancient Rome and Hellenization in the west.

Ban Chao's description of Daqin is quite different from the stories about Daqin and its descendants in ancient Rome and East Rome when Daqin envoys visited China later. Since ancient times, China has always questioned whether Fulin is the ancient Daqin or Ji Lang is the Daqin.

Questioning western history didn't happen today. At the latest, when Nestorianism was entrusted as the religion of Daqin State in China in the Tang Dynasty, many people in China questioned Nestorianism, which became the main basis of Daqin in ancient Rome. At the same time, it is also the main motivation for Nestorianism, that is, Christianity to tell its history in order to preach in China. In the Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties, the biggest obstacle Christianity encountered in China was its disapproval. The history of Christianity and the history of the Great Qin State have become muddled accounts so far.

There are too many questions about western history, which is the basic knowledge of those who are familiar with the history of China. However, due to the great influence of western modern times, they are unwilling to take it seriously. They can say whatever they like, but we can't hit people in the face anyway, can we?