2. This paper studies xxxx, which has strong practical value and provides a new basis for controlling accounting information distortion. The author has clear thinking, rigorous discussion process, reasonable analysis and practical results. The writing of the thesis is standardized and the sentences are fluent, which meets the requirements of academic proofreading of dissertations.
3. English: The topic of the thesis conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is average. The topic selection has academic research (reference) value (practical guiding significance). The student's ability to consult documents is average, and he can collect information about the examination system. In the process of writing, he can basically use the knowledge of the examination system and comprehensively analyze the problems of the examination system, and his ability to comprehensively use knowledge is average. The length of the article fully meets the requirements of the college, the content is basically complete, the hierarchical structure is general, and the main points are focused on certain logic, but there is a lack of personal opinions. The topics are basically the same, and the arguments are more prominent. Discussion can better serve the argument. The language expression is general, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Referring to some documents, its timeliness is general; No obvious plagiarism was found.
4. Pass the exam: the topic of the paper meets the professional training objectives, and can basically achieve the comprehensive training objectives, with less difficulty and less workload. The title of the thesis is general, and the comment is "A Complete Collection of Academic Comments of Tutors". Students' ability to consult documents is poor, and they can't collect information about the examination system comprehensively. In the process of writing, his ability to comprehensively apply the knowledge of examination system and comprehensively analyze the problems of examination system is poor. The length of the article meets the requirements of the college, the content is not complete enough, the hierarchical structure is problematic, the main points are not prominent enough, the logic is poor, and there is no personal opinion. The title of the article is biased, the argument is not prominent enough, and the discussion can't stick to the theme. The language expression is poor and the format meets the requirements of the specification; Less possession data and poor timeliness; Some contents are similar to others' achievements.