First, we should choose subjects with a tendency of scientific exploration.

There is no clear and specific theoretical guidance, research hypothesis, uncertainty, and no exploration tendency, which has no exploration significance. The papers written are also worthless. When choosing a topic, we should choose a topic with innovative and practical value, instead of staying on the surface of theory/article, and research/technical papers should be able to solve real-life problems. After research and investigation, it only stays on the percentage, describes meaningless small links, and does not experience the correlation and causality between variables.

Second, the pursuit of the topic should not be too high.

The topic selection of prose can start from an early age, instead of deliberately pursuing the general direction, building castles in the air with "strategy", "strategy" and "development", showing the tendency of "inverted pyramid" and "emptiness" In the process of writing, it is impossible to cover everything. Therefore, the direction of the thesis is relatively small, which will be helpful for the study of academic/technical writing.

Third, don't be vague about the topic.

The topic of the composition must not be empty and vague, which is a common problem in learning/technical composition. The topic selection of composition/essay is inseparable from judgment, and the topic should be expressed with the concept of accurate meaning, so that the topic of composition/essay will not be too vague. Although there are many topics that can be written, it is also difficult to write topics. Without writing ability, you may not write deeply. It is also possible that the improper use of words leads to vague concepts and cannot stand scrutiny.

Fourth, the topic should have academic/technical significance.

Learning/technology is one of the limitations of theory/article topic selection. The topic of a study/technology theory/article should be of study/technology significance, pioneering and advanced.

(1) Pioneering: To further explore and study the arguments that have not been studied by predecessors or have not achieved ideal results. Or there are differences in academic/technical circles, which need in-depth study and discussion.

(2) Innovation: The theory/paper must have its own unique opinions, and the academic/technical research done must have certain novelty/innovation.