Really, write about the future trouble first and shout loudly to attract people's attention. Here, let's discuss why Shen said that "knowing the security and not knowing the danger, you can escape without working", and what you are not used to using military defense at ordinary times is harmful to Su Shi's paper, which attaches importance to artistic diversity and creativity, and is very promising to Huang Mao Bai Wei.
Such as Yi (A), his creation also roughly practiced this idea. He did not analyze it theoretically, but quoted some historical facts to prove it. The first king returned to the system. "Although the world is peaceful, I dare not forget the war." Therefore, I often teach people to talk about martial arts. "Therefore, although there are thieves, the people will not be surprised." Later generations used "pedantic theory of Confucianism" and "if the world stands, it will be hidden." Therefore, "if a pawn is a thief, he will be afraid of fraud and leave without fighting." It is easy to know which way to do it and which way to end it. Take the Anshi Rebellion in the Tang Dynasty for example: the imperial court suppressed Wu Xiuwen, and the people were at peace, so the Anshi Rebellion went into chaos in one fell swoop, and everyone was in a state of panic and was at a loss, and the Li Tang Empire never recovered. At this point, forgetting the right and wrong of fighting and joining the army, the necessity of learning to fight and speak martial arts has been proved by facts, and there is no doubt.
This is true, but what is the reason? The third paragraph goes on to explain the idea. But he still did not infer from theory, but explained it with vivid and appropriate metaphors. Farmer Wang, well-trained, so "cold and summer are not poisonous"; Princes and nobles, "raise too much", on the contrary, "small loss is big, then people are hot and cold." It can be seen that hard work is the best way to keep healthy.
The word "husband and people are the same" returns to the topic in one fell swoop. Although the author didn't make these words clear, the reader can understand them. In the following, when it comes to current events, the first four sentences should start from the first paragraph. Nowadays people are not used to fighting and defending, and scholars have never said anything about fighting. "They are too scared and raise too much." In case of a hasty event, why should they defend the country against the enemy?
The fourth paragraph, according to the analysis of the situation of ethnic contradictions at that time, points out that war is inevitable and the use of troops is inevitable. The use of troops is inevitable, and the ruling and opposition parties are tired of talking about military reform and are not used to fighting and defending. The truth that "there must be accidents" is obvious, and it is absolutely necessary to teach the people to fight and defend, and it is beyond doubt. Here echoes the last four sentences of the first paragraph from a distance. The layout is extremely rigorous and the context is very clear.
Then, naturally, he put forward his own specific methods to teach the people to fight and defend, refuting the arguments that "negotiators", "invincible people will move" and "people will be uneasy" are unreasonable. Finally, he pointed out that when people get used to soldiers, they will break the arrogance of "soldiers gather in the world", and it is always beneficial to teach people to fight and defend.
With these two paragraphs, the article also feels more tired.
As for how to make the paper more lively, as long as we are good at chewing and digesting, the skills of this article are undoubtedly of reference significance.
Although the world is peaceful, we dare not forget the war. Only when we are prepared for danger in times of peace can we relax and work and prevent unexpected disasters. Therefore, we advocate teaching the people to learn to fight and to talk about soldiers at ordinary times. Does this train of thought have any enlightenment and reference significance for us? Is it useful?
The answer should be yes. However, after criticism and analysis, we should "send saliva, gastric juice and intestinal juice through our own oral chewing and gastrointestinal movement, decompose them into essence and dross, and then excrete the dross and absorb the essence", but we can't move the author's ideas intact, otherwise, it is useless to eat them alive.
The author said in the preface to the policy that "the minister's smell is the ruler, and there is a book in order." What Huanhuan said is suitable for today and is also very important for governance. If you are interested, please list the gains and losses. " Visible, he took pains to write these twenty-five "Jin Ce", the original intention is to make suggestions for the rule of Zhao and Song Dynasties. Of course, the article "Teaching War and Defending Strategy" is no exception. The basis and core of the author's anxiety is whether the Zhao and Song regimes can be maintained and consolidated. Within the ruling class, some people are thinkers of this class. "This is their positive and generalizable ideological representative, and they regard creating their own illusions as their main source of life" (Marx and Engels: German Ideology). Su Shi is the representative of the ruling class in Zhao and Song Dynasties.
Because he is the ideological representative of the ruling class, it is inevitable that he will be branded as the ruling class in his thought of "teaching and keeping".
First of all, he said: In a peaceful world, "people are satisfied with happiness every day" and even "addicted to games, wine and food". Therefore, "they are hard-hearted, courageous, dull and depressed." We know that in the so-called peaceful and prosperous times of any feudal era, whether it is the rule of Wenjing in Han Dynasty, Zhenguan in Tang Dynasty or Kaiyuan Dynasty, the people's situation is just that they can be slaves relatively stably. Stability is stability, but it is only a slave after all. "Farmer Wang, a masterpiece in midsummer, poor winter dew, bone-breaking, skin-soaked, light frost, wind and rain dew, but cold and heat can't be poisonous." This is a more realistic portrayal of their lives. Therefore, there are things that he does not carry out military reform or defend the war, but what he calls "being content with pleasure" and "between games and wine and food" have never happened from beginning to end; Of course, the so-called "it is rigid in heart and courage, consumes dullness and paralysis, and no longer vibrates" phenomenon is even more impossible. This is obviously a distortion of the people's appearance in the so-called feudal prosperous times.
He added: "Today's people have been in peace for a long time, and the people in the world are arrogant and extravagant, lazy and fragile, such as obedient and obedient, and never leave the boudoir." What was the situation then? After the founding of the People's Republic of China in the Song Dynasty, the consistent policy was: internally, "those who are caught by hundreds of officials are afraid of their shortcomings, and those who are worthy of the people are left behind" (Zhao Yi: "Twenty-two Historical Records" Volume 25 "Song Lu Zhi Hou"); As for the national enemy, we should "respect as brothers" and "respect as your father" (The Complete Works of Taishi Shengan compiled by Yang Shen Yang Youren, Volume 48). Therefore, "every family is bad, and the whole art is new year after year" (Li Gou's poem "Village Tour"). "Double in the Spring and Autumn Period, and the world is two thirds poor" (Zhang Yong's "Poor Farmers"). When the result was still there, Wang Xiaobo and he shouted the slogan "My illness is uneven between the rich and the poor, and now it is equal to your generation" and rebelled in Shu (History of Song Dynasty, volume 276, Biography of Fan Ju Valley, volume 25, Shen Kuo). Since then, the revolutionary struggle of farmers has broken out one after another. Therefore, the so-called "flattening" at that time was only a deformed surface phenomenon. Can people under such rule be "arrogant, lazy and fragile"? Can you "stay in the boudoir"? Obviously, it was also a distortion of the people's appearance at that time. This is undoubtedly inseparable from the position and prejudice of the author's feudal ruling class. In fact, it is only the feudal ruling class that is "content with pleasure", "playing between wine and food" and "arrogant and fragile", while the people have always been not only hardworking, but also have the traditional revolutionary spirit.
Secondly, because the author stood on the position of the feudal ruling class, he could not recognize and refuse to recognize the great spiritual outlook of the people, so he could not fully trust, organize and mobilize the people's strength. "Shu Ren in the officer, teach to line array section; Those who steal from the people's service are given the art of assassination. " The "official" in Shu Ren refers to the handyman who is transferred to the government service; "Thief serving the people" refers to an officer who has been drawn to catch thieves. I have talked for a long time about the importance of teaching people to fight and defend, but its teaching and mobilization are pitiful, which is simply a drop in the bucket. How helpful can this be? If the whole people are mobilized and armed, and "all people are soldiers", it will effectively crack down on the aggressive arrogance of national enemies and safeguard the security of the motherland and the people. But at the same time, they will also effectively crack down on the autocratic rule imposed on them by class enemies and defend their own interests. Doesn't this mean that the feudal ruling class will perish? How can they dig their own graves?
Then, the above uneven phenomenon is easy to understand. Ye Gong is a really good dragon! The attitude of the ruling class towards the people is always so contradictory and ridiculous.
These are all the dross that we need to decompose and discard. Only by removing these impurities can we learn something that is really beneficial to us.