20 10, Yushu earthquake in Qinghai, Xinde Middle School set off a huge donation and love activity. After the activity, the political and educational affairs office of the school will list the students who participated in the donation in turn according to the number of donations, and post the list, which caused controversy between teachers and students. What do you think of this matter?
Please choose an angle to write. The title is self-made, the concept is self-defined, and the style is self-selected (except poetry), not less than 800 words.
The difference between material composition and topic composition
The main difference between topic composition and material composition lies in the role of materials in the writing process and the treatment of materials in the articles written.
The materials provided by the topic composition are only the introduction, just the beginning of writing. It does not limit the theme of the composition, as long as the composition is within the scope of the topic. Topic composition pays more attention to the publicity of students' personality and can ignore the materials provided. The theme and genre of the article are self-determined, as long as it is related to the material.
New material composition
The materials provided by the material composition are the basis of writing and contain the main idea of the article. The author must grasp the center of the material. This is the soul of your article. To put it simply, the main idea of the material is the argument of the argumentative essay you want to write, and the central idea of your narrative, especially when writing an argumentative essay, is to use the given material. Once the material composition is separated from the material or deviates greatly, it is a serious digression.
You can choose a side and an angle to conceive the composition, which is very novel
Question test prompt
"Seen from one side of the mountain, the height is different." Everything in the world is multifaceted, so we should learn to analyze it from multiple angles.
This composition belongs to the method of evaluating the times, so we should pay attention to the word "debate" in the materials. Since it is an "argument", there must be pros and cons.
Angle 1: Agree to "arrange in turn and post the list". Because it encourages all teachers and students to do charity. "It is fair to arrange the list of students according to the number of donations and publish it on the list", "It is also a practice of charitable activities to arrange the list of students according to the number of donations" and "Publishing the list of donations can achieve benign interaction".
Angle 2: Oppose "arranging and posting in turn". Because no matter how much you donate, you can express your love. Do what you can, don't compare with others, don't have vanity, and don't measure your love by how much you donate.
Angle 3: Think about why charity activities are embarrassing, because the methods used in charity activities are suspected of deviating from the original intention of love, which can be discussed from the relationship between purpose and result (such as doing bad things with good intentions).
Angle 4: Dialectical analysis. What are the reasonable factors, what are the negative effects, and what should be done to be reasonable?
Comment 1. How to treat the donation list?
Famous school model essay
Example 1,
There is nothing wrong with the "donation list"
Xinde Middle School held a donation activity for Yushu disaster area, and arranged the list of students according to the number of donations, which caused controversy. Personally, I think it is understandable for the school to do so.
Regardless of emotional entanglements, it is rational to arrange and post the student list according to the number of donations. Some people who are dissatisfied with the publicity of the list often have the psychology of caring for the weak and offering love. Now that the name ranks so low, do you underestimate your heart? The care I give is not measurable by money. But I personally think that donors who have this idea have lost a normal heart. The school posted a list of donors to express appreciation and praise for the love of all students who donated money. Doesn't the school praise them as long as they are among them, no matter before or after the ranking? Besides, the names published on the list must be ranked first, and the list of students cannot be arranged in the order of the number of donations. Is it necessary to arrange them alphabetically or in stroke order?
It is also a common practice for charitable activities to sort and post donations in turn. Let the donated money and materials become clear accounts, clean accounts and safe accounts. Although the focus of donation is heart, donating more and donating less is a heart. The poor student will be grateful to every donor, and will never be different because of the amount of personal donations, but some people help more and others help less. Who can deny this? Since ancient times, people in China have been accustomed to "making contributions by setting up a monument" for charitable activities. There is nothing wrong with announcing the amount of donations made by donors, but it is a manifestation of "gratitude for kindness". Wenchuan earthquake, Zhouqu debris flow and other disasters have caused donations from all walks of life. Didn't CCTV also publish the donation list?
Love needs to be infected and set an example. Publishing the donation list can achieve benign interaction. In the special period of Wenchuan earthquake and Zhouqu mudslide disaster, how could we receive tens of billions of charitable donations in a short time if it was not a benign interaction? If donors and their donations don't get feedback after each donation activity, will everyone still have this enthusiasm?
Lei Feng never cared whether he left his name or not when he did good deeds. He is happy to help others all his life, and he is very satisfied. If at that moment in history, Lei Feng's diary was not discovered, his good deeds were not exposed, and his name could not go down in history, would he feel sorry? Do you think this matter is unfair to him and controversial with the world? Definitely not. Then why should we care about our ranking?
The donation list only truthfully records the amount of donations from teachers and students. We should not misread and over-interpret the list. When we put our minds right, we will find that the donation list is really easy to understand.
Comments: This article chooses the second angle to oppose "arranging and posting in turn". Equally well-founded: the "donation list" is too extreme, and love is measured only by the number of donations; It will lead to a comparison mentality and make love deteriorate; Moreover, true love needs to be tasted with heart.
A thousand rivers have a thousand rivers and a thousand moons. From different angles, we can have different interpretations of one thing. No matter what angle you choose, you should learn to explain the truth thoroughly and make your point of view "tenable" and "firm".
Example 2,
Why measure the "donation list" of love?
After Xinde Middle School held a charity donation activity, Zhangbang published a "charity donation list", which triggered a debate between teachers and students.
In my opinion, the "donation list" is not desirable.
It is extreme to measure love only from the number of donations on the "donation list". When the students were sick, everyone gave generously, whether it was coins or hundred-dollar bills, they all expressed the true feelings of saving the students' lives as soon as possible and showed sincere concern from the heart. This kind of love is the same. Perhaps, you can say that such a move has promoted students' sense of dedication. So who can claim that the amount of donations must be proportional to the amount of love? Announcing the amount of students' donations may not promote good deeds, nor may it improve students' moral index. On the contrary, it will arouse everyone's resentment: Is it wrong to donate less? Is it love to donate more?
"Donation list" will lead to comparison psychology and make love deteriorate. Once, there was a picture on the Internet: a beggar rolled up his sleeves and stretched out his arm to grab blood. His words shocked my heart: I have no money, but I have blood. How deep is love? How can you measure it with money? How can you compare yourself so crazily, trying to squeeze out the last drop of your love to flaunt the greatness of your personality and squeeze out the last kiss of others to prove the fullness of kindness? As we all know, posting a list is not a sign of holiness, but a symbol of showing off wealth. These vain actions have projected their ugly personalities onto the moral starry sky. What we squeeze out is not love at all, but superficiality and ignorance, comparison and personality decline.
True love needs to be tasted with heart. I still remember the lonely old man who carefully put 100 yuan into the donation box during the Wenchuan earthquake, and Mozambique, an African country that donated 40 thousand yuan during the Yushu earthquake. Perhaps in the face of the torrent of love, these tiny waters are so insignificant, but we always burst into tears because of such actions and sing selflessly and generously. True love is not just about how much you give. Only by comparing a person's wealth with everything he has contributed can he truly highlight the greatness of his personality. Therefore, when we try our best to lend a helping hand, we don't have to be ashamed of the lack of material, and no one has the right to consider love as a magnifying glass. Each of us may not be a rich man, but the wealth of the soul is infinite.
I still remember the story that a little girl stood in front of the donation box in tears and turned to her mother behind her and asked, "Mom, I have no money to donate to those poor children. What should I do? " Mother took her hand and said to her as she walked, "Then donate a smile!" " The little girl smiled at the donation box, once, twice, three times ... She donated seven smiles, which are the most beautiful seven-color flowers in the world.
Love is not hype, love is the desire to drive away fame and fortune, without asking for anything in return; It is not a tool to compare and show off, but it is purely selfless to give out the natural childlike innocence. Love, with the shackles of fame and fortune, can never be love by squeezing the last drop of love. Love doesn't need to be ranked and compared like this, and it doesn't need to help others, and it doesn't need to be known by everyone. Maybe you will ask what love is, and the answer is actually very simple, just like a little girl: dropping sincere dew with a smiling stamen.
Why measure the "donation list" of love!
Comment on the first angle of this article and agree with "arrange and post in turn" I also interpret my views from three aspects: "It is fair to arrange the student list according to the number of donations and publish it on the list", "Arranging the student list according to the number of donations is also a practice of charitable activities" and "Publishing the donation list can achieve benign interaction". The context is clear and the words are reasonable.
Huilai No.1 high school model essay
1, value for money, but love is priceless.
Senior three (1) Fang Bimei
Giving a helping hand in the Yushu earthquake should have been done by everyone with conscience, but I really don't agree with this practice in Xinde Middle School. Because things are worth money and love is priceless, it is irrational to instill this spirit of "fame and fortune" in students.
First of all, donations are not for comparison. According to the meaning of the school, is it that the more you donate, the more caring you will be? As we all know, students' economy comes from their families, and parents give different materials. Does the school rank the list simply by family income? Is it true that the money donated by Bill Gates is charity? Is a dollar donated by American civilians really not love? Presumably, the school should learn from the Qinghai Dust Organizing Committee. People unite with all the caring dust, and finally achieve many major charitable activities, and Jet Li's "One Foundation" has also made a lot of contributions to charity in China ... value for money, value for love. Enda Huang, a "good Hong Kong man", didn't donate much money! However, people work hard and give love to the disaster areas. It was his love that touched 654.38+03 billion China compatriots. The school divides love into three grades in this way, which is really trampling on the love of students and teachers.
Secondly, the school should be a purely educational place. It is not only responsible for imparting knowledge to students, but also for instilling positive thoughts in students. Has the person in charge of planning the school to rank the amount of donations ever thought about how this will affect students? The purpose of posting the grade list is to let students keep up with the students with good grades. So does posting the donation list imply to students that they should keep up with the donation? The wind of material enjoyment of campus comparison has been repeatedly banned. If the school continues to add fuel to the fire like this, the consequences are not optimistic! I'm afraid this move by the school is a failure.
As the saying goes: there are not many gifts, but it is good to have a heart. Even the grandmother who carries water knows the truth, and the school representative who is a model must know it. He can even cite a long piece of material to prove this point, but why is it so absurd to implement it?
With the prevalence of "official standard" and "money standard", schools should try their best to defend a piece of pure land on campus, and don't let students think: "I don't donate love, I donate money, which is a ranking in the rankings. Donating money is better than scoring. I can make the last ranking anyway. "
2 1+20+9=50
2. The highest state of doing good.
Senior 3 (1) Zhong Junhang
In order to support the people who died in the Yushu earthquake in Qinghai, the wave of love in Xinde Middle School is on the rise. A ray of winter sunshine gives people warmth and strength, and it also shines on the famous wall erected by a "willing heart".
So good, really carry forward the love of students?
Seeing the "wall" engraved with words, I clearly saw that some students were swaggering around this wall, while others tried to avoid it; It's a little embarrassing that we donate less. In this way, doing good seems to be a wrestling field for students' self-esteem, and the concept of doing good disappears. Comparison is a stage for doing good. Those who can do well on the stage can only hide under the stage.
Everyone knows China's richest man, Chen cursor. Doing good deeds has always been high-profile. The amount of money he donated and the people he donated were always recorded by the media. Great feat! That's great. He once went to Taiwan Province to do good deeds with gongs and drums until he issued an "ultimatum" to the local government. In the face of people who can't see their eyes, he said very generously, "I will do good like this, or you will compete with me for the first good in China." So doing good, doing good, but always feeling bad; Chen cursor relies on his deep pockets to let the realm of doing good fall to the bottom. What's more, people who donate less dare not do good easily. For the comparison of power and status, good deeds were once subverted, and fraudulent donations were once staged, for the "face" comparison between stars.
This realm of doing good is not only dignity, but also the dignity of the supporters. Once there was a girl who was ill and went to the hospital because her family was poor, and asked the school for help. The school immediately launched a charity activity and raised 20,000 yuan for her to pay for the operation. But with this charity, there is also a roster-a roster full of donated students' names. Strangely, the girl's temperament changed completely after her illness. Originally cheerful and lively, she became withdrawn and timid. The reason is that the real name gives a title of killing girls. Imagine how you feel when you stand in front of your classmates and think of the 100 yuan he donated to me. This kind of roster fetters an open mind and does good deeds at the expense of girls' dignity, and its negative influence cannot be ignored.
No matter who you are, no matter how the world changes, the highest realm of doing good should be: dismantling the stage of "comparing" the dignity of the good doer and setting up a skyscraper of benefactor dignity. Let the soul roam the world and let the good deeds ripple in the heart. The highest state of doing good is bound to shine with the light of human spirit of advocating beauty.
20+20+8=48
3. Unless explicitly stated, it cannot be promoted.
Senior three (1) Weng Xu Ying
The Political and Educational Affairs Office of Xinde Middle School is arranged in order according to the amount of donations from teachers and students, and posted. There is nothing wrong with this practice in schools.
In today's world, there are many people waiting for help. It is impossible to solve the problem by relying on only a few people. Charity needs everyone's participation. Only by expressing those charitable acts can we call on everyone to take action and make the world full of love.
Great reforms always need someone to guide them. The opening of a new charity world. It also needs great people to push it.
With the development of economy, there are more and more rich people in the world, and some of them will kindly lend a helping hand to the poor. When Buffett announced that he would donate more than half of his property, he had already opened the door to charity. His high-profile is not to show off, but to call for more people to participate. Chen cursor also responded, becoming the first good in China. Their actions have pushed more enterprises onto the road of charity. Without their promotion, I am afraid there would not be such a generous entrepreneur today.
Of course, it is difficult to complete the reform without the masses. Expressing charity also encourages ordinary people to give love and warm the world.
The purpose of the school to announce the number and list of donations is nothing more than to thank and encourage those caring children, so that they can always be kind-hearted, and there is nothing wrong with it. If it is an insult to measure charity by fame and fortune, then I want to say whether it is wrong to encourage and cultivate children's kindness by material satisfaction. Without the public's extensive participation in charity, it will be difficult for those who suffer in the third world to get rid of their pain. And this broad mass base needs us to cultivate from an early age. I have to say that the strength of the masses is sometimes greater than greatness.
Furthermore, in today's world, even if there are unknown charitable acts, if they are not exposed, I am afraid those people will always be charitable.
In addition to the efforts of leaders and the masses, the reform of charity sometimes requires "image endorsement" to call on more people to participate.
Jet Li's One Foundation didn't receive the prize, but without Jet Li's endorsement, I'm afraid the foundation wouldn't have developed so fast. The endorsement of Hollywood movie star Audrey Hepburn also makes people actively participate in it.
To this end, we have to say that charity needs to make the world understand that understanding charity can have greater appeal, maximize love and solve people's poverty.
You can't push it unless you express it. Let's act and let love fill the world.
22+ 19+8=49
4. Love should not be used for comparison.
Senior three (3)
Love should be people's heartfelt kindness, and love should never be regarded as a simple set of data, even like Xinde Middle School, which is arranged in order according to the number of donations and posted. The school's approach is really inappropriate! Love should not be used for comparison.
Admittedly, the school's approach has certain benefits. Just like the ranking exam, the position before and after can always bring inexplicable pressure to students. In this way, many people have to donate "love". In this way, the school will certainly raise more money than other schools, and compatriots in the disaster areas will also receive more donations. This is also a kind of praise and encouragement for students who donate more.
However, the school leaders neglected an important issue. Once the ranking list comes out, it will definitely cause a storm. Donate less and feel inferior, and donate more and you will be pointed at behind. Such as: "that's him, how cool! Know that your family has money! " Or: "The second generation is coming, look!"
There is pressure to donate more, and there is also pressure to donate less. If there is a Forbes rich list, there must be a poor list. In this way, children from poor families will only feel that they can't lift their heads and blame the school.
For those students who don't want to donate, it's like forcing them to pay with a knife. Not only did it fail to play an educational role, but it sowed bad seeds. With the knife gone, does he still have love? I'm afraid it will become more indifferent.
Love cannot be reduced to groups of data, and every caring child should praise it. Let children know that love is around, love should start from an early age and know how to give!
One hundred dollars is not much. For the rich, it's 9 Niu Yi points. For beggars, astronomical figures. I still remember that an old beggar donated all his savings during the Wenchuan earthquake. Is it expensive? Not much, but it is the embodiment of love and the glory of human nature!
According to the school's practice, how many old beggars should be ranked? But he obviously touched countless people in China! This is love!
The school should take off the ranking, only explain the total amount and praise every child who donates.
Love, big or small, is good as long as it is dedicated. If schools strengthen education, students' donations will never be less. More importantly, let students know how to help each other!
Love should not be used for comparison. The school's practice does not rule out speculation, or what gray and black areas are behind this large donation. ...
I can only sigh: this love has gone bad!
20+20+9=49
Love should not be announced by ranking.
Senior three (1) Liu
There are many caring people with lofty ideals in the society. After the disaster, they always lend a helping hand and give their love. This caused me to think: if I give love, should I rank it and announce it to the world? I do not think this is necessarily the case.
Giving love should be a heartfelt action and should not be ranked. After the Yushu earthquake, Xinde Middle School arranged the list of students according to the amount of donations and posted it. Perhaps school leaders want to inspire students' love, but in my opinion, this is a wrong approach. It is good for students to have love, but love must come from the heart. Maybe some students are very caring, but because their families are poor, they can't donate so much. This practice of the school undoubtedly hurts their self-esteem, which will only lead students to form an invisible comparison psychology in their future love activities, or try their best to ask for money from their families in order to save face, which may increase the economic burden of the already poor families. I can only say that this will only lead to a deformed "love".
Giving love should be silent. We should offer love in the hope that people in disaster will tide over the difficulties as soon as possible, not for ranking, but for fame. Donating a lot does not necessarily mean that a person is very caring, and donating to a young master does not mean that a person lacks love. After the Wenchuan earthquake, an old beggar gave everything he had and donated all the money he got from begging to the people who went back. He didn't donate much money, maybe it was only a drop in the bucket, but can this show that he "lacks love"? No, he can't. What he donated was all his property and all his love. Teachers' morality and love need not be announced to the world, let alone ranked. It's just that people should get out of the disaster as soon as possible. Based on this, can you still think that love can be ranked and published?
Of course, I also understand the painstaking efforts of the leaders of Xinde Middle School. Maybe they just want students to show more love and the people in the disaster area can get out of the disaster as soon as possible. But I don't agree with their painstaking efforts. The practice of publishing the number of donations by ranking will undoubtedly cause the "love" in the hearts of some students to be distorted, because the ranking of the number of donations does not mean the ranking of "love" in the hearts of students. Or you, the love you give, can't be measured by ranking.
Calling for silence to avoid noise
I am disappointed with the ranking of large-scale disaster relief donations in Xinde Middle School. Donating money for disaster relief is a good deed of mankind. Why are you covered in grandstanding mud?
What is the significance of donation ranking? Than human nature? Worse than kindness? Than character? Or is it because of the eye-catching skills?
The seven sacred treasures in the Classic of French Sentences are: faith, discipline, hearing, shame, shame, charity and wisdom. Regardless of the level of pay-a smile, a little care, is the spread of kindness and love. If we want to measure the weight of charity, then ask, which is more important, fake money or sincere prayer?
I can't help but send out my sad cry to this quiet world far away from the noise:
"What should I use to keep you?
I give you poor streets, desperate sunsets and the moon in the broken suburbs.
I'll give you the back of a man who has been watching the lonely moon for a long time. "
False donations, ranking of donations, and "empty check" charity … they deeply hurt the last tenderness of society. What is "kindness" covered in mud and ink? They have become a means to pursue fame and fortune and a ladder to climb the status. When you have no compassion in your heart and are poor to nothing, what charity do you take? There is only dust and sludge in your bag.
The tranquility of avoiding noise has been ravaged again and again.
When can we hold up a piece of pure land and let the kind and loving heart live poetically? When can I raise a clear spring and let beauty and truth stretch in the morning light?
I have no answer, but the answer is yours and mine.
"The Foguang Plateau is a paradise with three steps and two steps, but there are too many people to walk."
Since the heaven of truth, goodness and beauty is so close, why don't you and I give up the heavy interest scale and return the world to Yi Ning calmly?
I call for peace to avoid noise.
Not only for people, but also for yourself-awaken beauty and truth, and call back your own truth in singing and singing.
I don't want to see the full hype wearing a charity mask. Once this happens, what we call truth, goodness and beauty will become the world, just like Tagore said, and it will become a line of poems-no, not even poems, but a moaning without illness, a human lament lingering in the depths of the soul.
May the heart return to peace.