1, the paper has clear ideas and fluent sentences. Can be a good investigation of existing problems. The author has a certain understanding and familiarity with the content of the paper.

Clear thinking, clear hierarchy and reasonable logical structure. The viewpoint is expressed accurately. The research principles are appropriate. In the process of demonstration, we can effectively combine professional principles with the topics to be studied. The opinions demonstrated in some places are not very clear, and generally meet the requirements of graduation thesis.

2. The topic is reasonable and meets the requirements of administrative management. The full text analyzes and demonstrates ... with the theme of ..., which will improve the administration of ... China.

The content argument is more scientific and reasonable, the format is more standardized, and the reference materials are closely related to the theme requirements, but the innovation and arguments are insufficient, especially the last part of the argument is too weak and unconvincing. Generally speaking, it basically meets the requirements of graduation thesis.

3. Studying the official accountability system can provide reference for solving the problems existing in the official accountability system in China. In the structure of the full text, firstly, the practical significance of the official accountability system is analyzed, then the dilemma of the official accountability system in China is deeply analyzed, and finally effective suggestions are put forward to solve the dilemma.

The full text reflects the requirements of professional characteristics, meets the training requirements of administrative management specialty, and the references meet the needs of the paper's viewpoints and themes, and the practical demonstration is not enough. But there is not much real innovation. Generally speaking, it meets the requirements of graduation thesis.