1, in this case, the first thing to distinguish is the venue. If it is a fee-paying football field, the kicked person enters through an abnormal way, then as a special football field, the kicked person should be regarded as a normal phenomenon. In this case, I think the judge will tend to ask the kicker to pay about 10% according to fair liability;

2. If it is an ordinary venue, it is an ordinary civil tort liability. If the subject of infringement, the act of infringement and the consequence of infringement all exist, and there is no deliberately provocative and boring judge (which is generally impossible), then the liability for compensation will definitely not run away, and the responsibility is undisputed. In addition, the disease you mentioned is really difficult to prove, but according to the responsibility mechanism of who advocates who gives evidence, it is difficult to get support unless the kicked person can give evidence or ask the judge to take the medical records of the old man to prove that the old man had ear disease before.

Tort civil liability generally meets the following four elements:

1, damaging the facts. Damage facts include property damage, personal damage and mental damage (in line with this article);

2. illegal behavior. The actor's behavior conforms to the law, and even if it causes damage, it cannot and should not bear civil liability. For example, the act of performing official duties according to law. Violation of laws includes violation of laws and regulations and violation of social order and good customs (this article is inconsistent);

3. Causality. Causality refers to the causal relationship between the illegal act and the damage consequences (in line with this article);

4. Subjective fault. Including intentional and negligent forms. Intention means that the actor has foreseen the harmful consequences of his actions and still actively pursues or lets the consequences happen (this article is inconsistent). Negligence refers to the actor's failure to perform his duty of reasonable care and fail to foresee the damage consequences, which leads to the occurrence of damage consequences (in line with this article).

To sum up, if it can be determined that it was kicked by the party concerned, which caused certain harm to the victim, the party concerned shall be liable for compensation. If the parties are students and minors, the guardians of the parties, that is, parents, shall bear the other party's liability for compensation. The amount of compensation depends on the degree of the other party's injury, generally based on the hospital's medical records and medical expenses. If both parties disagree about the amount, and both parties fail to reach an agreement through negotiation, they can settle it through litigation.

Legal basis:

Article 1 198 of the Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC).

Operators, managers or organizers of mass activities in hotels, shopping malls, banks, stations, airports, stadiums, entertainment places and other business places shall bear tort liability if they fail to fulfill their security obligations and cause damage to others.

If the behavior of a third party causes damage to others, the third party shall bear the tort liability; Operators, managers or organizers who fail to fulfill their security obligations shall bear corresponding supplementary responsibilities. Operators, managers or organizers may claim compensation from a third party after assuming supplementary responsibilities.

Article 176

Voluntary participation in cultural and sports activities with certain risks causes damage to other participants, and the victim shall not ask other participants to bear tort liability; However, unless other participants have intentional or gross negligence in the occurrence of damage.

The responsibilities of event organizers shall be governed by the provisions of Articles 1 198 to 120 1 of this Law.