According to my personal observation, according to my Chinese teacher, I found that there may be a central argument in the first few paragraphs (of course, I know there must be a central argument), but I can't see where the sub-arguments are. Of course, I don't rule out my limited ability.
For example, the first sentence at the beginning of the text: think more about learning knowledge; Think more and invent; The more you think about your brain, the more you use it. The first sentence at the beginning of the three paragraphs was written like this before the argument.
The problem is that most of the college entrance examination compositions are not like this. A few years ago, but in recent years, it is rare. Do not believe me, just find a perfect composition. It is not convenient for me to post other people's compositions here.
Of course, the example of the argument I put on the mask is the simplest, and there are many ways to argue. Powerful people use several methods to write from the perspective of "what is it and how to do it", but there is no obvious method. However, I don't see any argument in his article. He writes directly, and some give examples at the beginning. Anyway, he can't see any sentences with similar arguments. So here, I would like to ask whether the composition that meets the college entrance examination standard should have a central argument and a sub-argument. The central argument is absolutely necessary. As for the argument? How to reflect it? A composition, I give several different examples, foreign, China, modern, these three types constitute three paragraphs respectively. At the beginning and end of the composition, do you think it is argumentative? My three paragraphs can be demonstrated from different angles through different examples.
For experienced people, it is best to be a professor and an excellent teacher. Don't talk nonsense if you don't understand, be specific and clear! ! !