The only thing that impressed me was that there was a lesson about the sinking of a ship in the vast sea. There are 12 people on board, including a 72-year-old doctor, a captain, a terminally ill girl, a mentally retarded boy, a prisoner who is proficient in sailing, a priest, a prostitute, a young model worker, an enterprise manager, an upstart, a corrupt national cadre and himself, but only six lifeboats can be released. At that time, a classmate said loudly and confidently that the strong should be let on board and the weak should stay. His reason is that this society is driven by the strong. At that time, I thought what he said was wrong. When this society has developed into a society without feelings and morality, when this society has developed into a naked interest relationship and a cold machine, who wants to live in this society? But in that class, I didn't stand up and refute him. I think I did something wrong. A student who studies philosophy and life should not refute fallacies or stand up against evil theories. This class let me see my own shortcomings, let me reflect on my behavior, and let me have more courage to stand up and fight for the truth in this situation in the future. ,
Confucius once said, "Be a teacher". Although you are my teacher, when I do my duty, I should also point out your mistakes and shortcomings, only to do better in the future.
First, it was not Crazy English Li Yang who played water for my roommate in college for four years, but New Oriental Yu.
Second, talk about aesthetics, not looking at sketches. Teachers can talk about what beauty is and how to appreciate it in detail during the lecture, or insert a short video as an example during the lecture. But the teacher put the cart before the horse, only talked about a little beauty, and then put a long sketch of Zhao Benshan. In the laughter, I can't see the beauty at all, just like on the Spring Festival Evening.
Third, the content of the teacher's lecture should be as novel as possible, close to life, and don't show us some vague, exaggerated and old-fashioned content. Judging from the video of Sun Zhengyu's lecture shown by the teacher, although he was born in the School of Philosophy and won any prizes, I think that none of the words that popped out of his mouth were his own, none were less than 500 years old, and none were "said by someone". The only advantage that the video brings me is that the girl opposite him is very beautiful.
The last section, Nine Principles that Decide Life, has a good title, but the content is not very good. I have read those contents n times in books such as Short Stories, 900 Philosophical Stories of Life, and Philosophical Stories that High School Students Must Know. The common features of these contents are vagueness, exaggeration, unreality, repetition and procrastination. It's really wrong for those contents to appear in college classes.
The above are my feelings and suggestions after taking philosophy and life class this semester. This is my true feeling. I really don't want to "how well this course is taught" and "how much I have learned" like some people there. For the sake of teachers' better classroom quality and students' more interests, I wrote the above sentence, which may be inappropriate or offensive to teachers, but the truth doesn't care about these. Please ask the teacher to point out where I am wrong. Isn't that what a student studying philosophy and life should do?