Graduation thesis is essential if you want to graduate smoothly from the self-taught examination. According to the relevant regulations, the grading results of graduation thesis can generally be divided into four grades: excellent, good, passing and failing. So what's the evaluation standard of CET-4 graduation thesis? Let's take a look with Bian Xiao!

First, excellent.

1, can correctly reflect the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, and can comprehensively apply the theories learned and the relevant knowledge of this major.

2, can closely contact the system, the department, the actual work of the unit. The analysis of the problem is correct and comprehensive, with certain depth or originality, which has certain guiding significance for practical work.

3. The center is prominent, the arguments are sufficient, the structure is rigorous, the level is clear, and the expression ability is strong.

4. Rich materials and reliable data can be processed by scientific methods.

Second, good.

1, can correctly reflect the relevant policies of the party and the state, and can better use the learned theories and professional knowledge.

2, can better contact with the actual work, the analysis of the problem is more correct and comprehensive, which has a certain reference function to guide the actual work.

3. The center is clear, the arguments are sufficient, the levels are clear, the sentences are fluent, and the expression ability is good.

4. The materials are rich, the data are basically reliable, and it can be well processed and sorted.

Third, pass the exam.

1, can correctly understand the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, has no principled mistakes in theory, and can basically master and apply the relevant knowledge learned in this major.

2. I can also connect with practical work, basically express my views, and have certain ability to analyze and solve problems. However, the analysis of the problem is superficial, or it can only list the phenomena, and the center is not prominent enough.

3. There are certain arguments, the main data are basically reliable, and the sentences are fairly smooth.

4. There are certain original materials, which have been processed and sorted out.

Fourth, failure.

Any of the following circumstances shall be deemed as unqualified.

1, violates the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, or commits a principled error in theory, and has a poor grasp of relevant professional knowledge.

2, the article has no center, unclear level, chaotic logic and unreasonable sentences.

3, the material is messy or the main data is distorted, and the processing is poor.

4. The main content is basically copying other people's achievements.

Any paper that plagiarizes others' achievements or is written by others will be disqualified from judging and defending once it is found and verified.