Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - How to write a good doctoral thesis?
How to write a good doctoral thesis?
The main problems in innovative writing of doctoral thesis and how to write it.

Isn't the doctoral thesis very simple? Just avoid plagiarism, such as someone's answer below!

(1) Find the research questions you are interested in, or the latest keywords in this field;

(2) Reading the bibliography and the recently published journal articles about this research;

(3) On the basis of previous studies, find out the direction that can and is worth continuing to study, and narrow the research direction through continuous reading;

(4) At this time, you can write an opening report and list the general outline;

(5) Use materials, data and appropriate mathematical models to calculate their own results and answer questions;

(6) write a paper!

This understanding is still at a certain level, but the problems in innovative writing are not clear at all. So what are the so-called writing suggestions and work? I used my own experience to guide Bolen's nonsense. Writing a doctoral thesis is easy, so it is difficult to start writing. Typical questions are as follows:

(1) The topic is always the latest, no matter whether there is a template to set. I don't know what the finished product looks like or the routine. The road under my feet must be crawling, time-consuming and laborious. Don't scold or be despised! I advise you, if you want to be new, you should also be down-to-earth, have a new vision and have a new routine! Daniel put forward a new theory, calf detail theory, rookie theory! To graduate from a doctoral thesis, you must at least reach the level of a calf. Otherwise, a bunch of big cows despise people like you who don't know how to get started!

(2) The analysis method is unclear and the analysis conclusion is unpredictable. Typical thinking ahead of time, to put it bluntly, is to forget even the most basic hypothesis test, such as metropolis. I advise you to come anyway. Start by drawing up the analysis conclusion, know what application problems to draw, or test the effect of the model, and then make up the logic. As for the logical process, if you really want to disagree, you can consider it; No, just make up a reason, or narrow the scope of the study and make the data clear!

(3) The composition is chaotic and irrelevant. Usually, there are no problem-oriented, method-oriented and countermeasure-oriented in the catalogue; There are still a lot of foreplay in Rory, and the analysis part has been taken over! In view of this, I still suggest that the boss honestly find a few good teachers, the layout and word distribution of each chapter. In addition, it is particularly important to say that doctoral dissertations tend to be theoretical articles, and routines generally tend to model first and then analyze cases, so don't mix theory with cases! The tendency of the master is that the third chapter begins to cut into the problems of the case, and then analyzes the problems with other people's models and gives countermeasures. As for undergraduate and master, don't play the first two chapters, just introduce a few hundred words and then analyze the case!

(4) The analysis is simple, the analysis part is dry, there is no data, no theory, and words can't be finished! In this case, it is necessary to consider how to use a mathematical algorithm to rub in the influencing factors in the theory, establish a model, and then take it to case analysis! Or, find a precursor model with this feature as a case study. Of course, some models are very low-level and have no mathematical content, such as SWOT, 4P and 4P, so this method should not be used as the core analysis part!

(5) Deviation, the rejection rate of words is too high. As for this kind, it is a typical teacher's laissez-faire in the early stage, not strict with papers and analytical methods, and a lot of picky in the later stage. You can only endure this situation unless you don't want to graduate! (6) Words are not enough. In this case, you should do more literature review to find other people's nonsense, summarize your dry goods and list many opinions with data. Also, doctor's, it's best to summarize the literature coherently, model first and then apply this routine, otherwise it will be finished in a few minutes, which is disgusting! Make do with it. As for innovation and how to avoid plagiarism, look for the first few issues first and take your time!

Original hand code, no commercial reprint!

Why do you feel so good and confused that you can't write it? Need service guidance, answer questions, do problem diagnosis, innovative planning, plagiarism prevention, you can find us. In addition, it can also connect statistical analysis, mathematical modeling, simulation analysis and other parts. If there is demand, Jia Weixin, editorking, can try it. "Day by day, waiting for you? o!”