First of all, the enlightenment or conclusion is the last part of the graduation thesis, which is the word "He". That is to say, it echoes the literature review in the graduation thesis. The structure of the whole paper should be "total-sub-total" or a combination of progressive and sub-total. Therefore, the word "combination" should be used as the principle of writing conclusion and enlightenment.

However, the graduation thesis is also hierarchical and phased. When writing conclusions and revelations, the three ways are completely different and must be explained one by one according to three different levels.

One is the conclusion and enlightenment of undergraduate graduation thesis. Generally, the length of undergraduate thesis is less than 20,000 words, and the basic writing method of conclusion and enlightenment only accounts for less than 1000 to 3,000 words, which is the conclusion and purpose of undergraduate graduation thesis.

The purpose is to briefly summarize the achievements you have made in this paper, which are different from previous achievements, that is, to compare and summarize, explain your contribution, and the significance and extension of further research for future generations. The principle of this place is "conforming to the structure". You can use Mandarin, but it must conform to the conclusions you have drawn from previous empirical analysis and the concept of mutual inheritance.

Second, the conclusion and enlightenment of the master thesis. Master's thesis is generally between 30,000 and 70,000, and the enlightenment part of this conclusion may need to be summarized in 6,000 to tens of thousands of words, so its focus is on "fitting the theme", which requires you to go further from the undergraduate stage, not only to promote the integrity of the whole thesis framework and structure, but also to further highlight the theme and highlight the rethinking of the theme, rather than just staying on the surface of the conclusion.

Here, I must ask what deep feelings I have gained from my research, and what is the difference from my previous understanding, or what is the difference from the stereotype formed by others when I first came into contact. Learning to ask such questions, this conclusion inspires me that writing has basically become.

The conclusion and enlightenment of the third doctoral thesis. It is meaningful for the master to understand the way of the doctor's conclusion, because he can help you write the conclusion further. The core way of doctoral stage is to "conform to the concept", because the later the paper is written, the more it needs to "see the big picture from the small" and learn to "make a mountain out of a molehill". At this time, writing a theme from a certain concept has become its necessary and inevitable academic ability.

What is discussed here is the third question of "conformity with the concept". Is the concept combination in my topic reasonable? Is there any difference between the connotation of a word I want to highlight and that of my predecessors? Is subversion reasonable? Should it be further clarified? What value can such clarification bring to academic circles? "Conforming to the concept" is to help us return to basics, gather our concerns and make small problems stronger and more rigorous.